From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Dennis - 21:05, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Kingsley Chigozie

Kingsley Chigozie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 18:44, 17 October 2014 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 18:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Emeka Darlington (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 18:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - They are playing in Bangladesh Premier League which is a fully professional league since 2009. -- Zayeem (talk) 05:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Can you support that claim with reliable sources? Sir Sputnik ( talk) 06:20, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
All of these sources describe the league merely as professional. They do not confirm full professionalism as is required per WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment I tried searching for "amateur" and "semi-pro(fessional)" together with the league name but didn't find anything mentioning these players in the league teams. There was no mention of something along the lines of "so-and-so, although one of the semi-pros, scored a magnificent goal", something which can be expected if it wasn't fully professional. - Takeaway ( talk) 22:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
That doesn't change the fact that the claim to notability remains unsourced per WP:VNT. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 23:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep- as far as I know, there's been no previous discussion of whether this league is fully professional. It certainly claims it's professional. [1] notes salaries of US$2,000 a month - which is about 15 times higher than that countries minimum wage - so one could easily subsist there on that kind of pay. [2] notes that there are transfer fees that have to be paid for an amateur player that joins the professional league. This article [3] discusses the league becoming professional in 2006 and the number of foreign players. This player auction indicates that there is some relatively significant coinage involved [ [4]]. Nfitz ( talk) 17:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Takeaway and Nfitz passes WP:GNG and Player has played in the 2014 AFC President's Cup and scored the winner in a game . [5], [6] and even otherwise get coverage [7]. [8], [9] without taking into the account regional Bengali press coverage. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 18:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Takeaway, Nfitz and Pharaoh of the Wizards - NickGibson3900 Talk 09:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment what constitutes notability for footballers and what makes them pass or fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL should be re-examined to avoid instances such as these when articles fall in that grey area. Inter&anthro ( talk) 14:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Per Nfitz. Sources provided certainly seem to indicate that salary levels within the league are sufficient to conclude that it is fully professional, you don't have to be earning £m in order to be in a FPL. Additional links from others to me support this as it is always essentially impossible to find a source that uses the phrase "fully professional". Fenix down ( talk) 12:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep both - Both are clearly notable fully professional footballers. IJA ( talk) 11:04, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Dennis - 21:05, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Kingsley Chigozie

Kingsley Chigozie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 18:44, 17 October 2014 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 18:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Emeka Darlington (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 18:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - They are playing in Bangladesh Premier League which is a fully professional league since 2009. -- Zayeem (talk) 05:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Can you support that claim with reliable sources? Sir Sputnik ( talk) 06:20, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
All of these sources describe the league merely as professional. They do not confirm full professionalism as is required per WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment I tried searching for "amateur" and "semi-pro(fessional)" together with the league name but didn't find anything mentioning these players in the league teams. There was no mention of something along the lines of "so-and-so, although one of the semi-pros, scored a magnificent goal", something which can be expected if it wasn't fully professional. - Takeaway ( talk) 22:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
That doesn't change the fact that the claim to notability remains unsourced per WP:VNT. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 23:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep- as far as I know, there's been no previous discussion of whether this league is fully professional. It certainly claims it's professional. [1] notes salaries of US$2,000 a month - which is about 15 times higher than that countries minimum wage - so one could easily subsist there on that kind of pay. [2] notes that there are transfer fees that have to be paid for an amateur player that joins the professional league. This article [3] discusses the league becoming professional in 2006 and the number of foreign players. This player auction indicates that there is some relatively significant coinage involved [ [4]]. Nfitz ( talk) 17:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Takeaway and Nfitz passes WP:GNG and Player has played in the 2014 AFC President's Cup and scored the winner in a game . [5], [6] and even otherwise get coverage [7]. [8], [9] without taking into the account regional Bengali press coverage. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 18:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Takeaway, Nfitz and Pharaoh of the Wizards - NickGibson3900 Talk 09:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment what constitutes notability for footballers and what makes them pass or fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL should be re-examined to avoid instances such as these when articles fall in that grey area. Inter&anthro ( talk) 14:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Per Nfitz. Sources provided certainly seem to indicate that salary levels within the league are sufficient to conclude that it is fully professional, you don't have to be earning £m in order to be in a FPL. Additional links from others to me support this as it is always essentially impossible to find a source that uses the phrase "fully professional". Fenix down ( talk) 12:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep both - Both are clearly notable fully professional footballers. IJA ( talk) 11:04, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook