The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Potential keep -- The chief minister (here called "apostle") of a megachurch ought to be notable. The problem is that this is a BLP, which requires references (and we have but one - not enough). If kept, rename to his actual name (without "king/prince David"). If not kept, redirect per Darreg.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 16:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. The Google News/Newspapers/Books/Scholar search links above suggest that the only notable thing about him is that he has (for now) a Wikipedia article. If he is notable under another name then it isn't obvious. Dropping the possibly spurious title "King" still only yields one hit. I have no strong objection to a redirect, if this really is the name he is known by, but if the title "King" is spurious and this article name is only being used because the article is salted under other names then a redirect might not help anybody. --
DanielRigal (
talk) 00:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete based on the total lack of sources (both in the article and that are able to be found.) Being an "apostle" is basically a job title in a church and nothing more. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 01:28, 19 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Significant player in Nigerian politics, head of very large church, sources available but "King" should perhaps be removed, I find him more often referred to as "Apostle". "Zilly Aggre" is a more useful search term. editors clicking on the new search term that I added above will find sources form which to expand the article.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 19:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 21:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Potential keep -- The chief minister (here called "apostle") of a megachurch ought to be notable. The problem is that this is a BLP, which requires references (and we have but one - not enough). If kept, rename to his actual name (without "king/prince David"). If not kept, redirect per Darreg.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 16:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. The Google News/Newspapers/Books/Scholar search links above suggest that the only notable thing about him is that he has (for now) a Wikipedia article. If he is notable under another name then it isn't obvious. Dropping the possibly spurious title "King" still only yields one hit. I have no strong objection to a redirect, if this really is the name he is known by, but if the title "King" is spurious and this article name is only being used because the article is salted under other names then a redirect might not help anybody. --
DanielRigal (
talk) 00:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete based on the total lack of sources (both in the article and that are able to be found.) Being an "apostle" is basically a job title in a church and nothing more. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 01:28, 19 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Significant player in Nigerian politics, head of very large church, sources available but "King" should perhaps be removed, I find him more often referred to as "Apostle". "Zilly Aggre" is a more useful search term. editors clicking on the new search term that I added above will find sources form which to expand the article.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 19:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 21:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.