The result was no consensus. The nominator has opted to change their view and would have sought to withdraw if all !votes supported clear retention. As this is not the case, closing as keep would not be appropriate, although delete !votes do not consider the sources subsequently identified. Any editor wishing to relist at AfD may renominate without prejudice. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 11:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
It seems he fails NFOOTY, with no appearances higher than Portugal's third tier or Germany's fourth tier. [1] looks like it may be SIGCOV, but I cant find any other decent sources, so at the moment, I think it also fails GNG. Microwave Anarchist ( talk) 11:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The nominator has opted to change their view and would have sought to withdraw if all !votes supported clear retention. As this is not the case, closing as keep would not be appropriate, although delete !votes do not consider the sources subsequently identified. Any editor wishing to relist at AfD may renominate without prejudice. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 11:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
It seems he fails NFOOTY, with no appearances higher than Portugal's third tier or Germany's fourth tier. [1] looks like it may be SIGCOV, but I cant find any other decent sources, so at the moment, I think it also fails GNG. Microwave Anarchist ( talk) 11:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)