The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Page seems insignificant, there appears to be no or little information on Google about the person, and the page has been tagged for over 3 years with no improvements. It is of no help to anyone.
Kiwuser (
talk) 01:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment – If someone can provide a reference my opinion would be Keep regardless the length of the article. ShoesssSTalk 13:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. Anyone know if this person exists in any of the Indian language-wikis?--Esprit15d •
talk •
contribs 16:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 05:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Obviously not notable.
Op47 (
talk) 18:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - local chieftains are not notable.
Bearian (
talk) 22:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Page seems insignificant, there appears to be no or little information on Google about the person, and the page has been tagged for over 3 years with no improvements. It is of no help to anyone.
Kiwuser (
talk) 01:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment – If someone can provide a reference my opinion would be Keep regardless the length of the article. ShoesssSTalk 13:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. Anyone know if this person exists in any of the Indian language-wikis?--Esprit15d •
talk •
contribs 16:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 05:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Obviously not notable.
Op47 (
talk) 18:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - local chieftains are not notable.
Bearian (
talk) 22:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.