The result was USERFY. A lot was made of WP:NFOOTBALL in this debate, but only two appearances in a league that is disputed to meet NFOOTY in any case is a bit marginal to say the least. Normally, I am not very sympathetic to "GNG trumps specific guidelines" type arguments, but in this case, I think the deletes have it. The article will be userfied as requested on the grounds that this may be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Spinning Spark 15:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFOOTY - the Scottish First Division isn't a WP:FPL, and he's played 1 game. Also fails WP:GNG. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:37, 28 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was USERFY. A lot was made of WP:NFOOTBALL in this debate, but only two appearances in a league that is disputed to meet NFOOTY in any case is a bit marginal to say the least. Normally, I am not very sympathetic to "GNG trumps specific guidelines" type arguments, but in this case, I think the deletes have it. The article will be userfied as requested on the grounds that this may be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Spinning Spark 15:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFOOTY - the Scottish First Division isn't a WP:FPL, and he's played 1 game. Also fails WP:GNG. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:37, 28 March 2013 (UTC) reply