The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and very little adequate sourcing to meet WP:GNG. Of the sources here, we have two articles in alt-weeklies (which would be acceptable amid a diversity of solid sourcing, but are not widely distributed enough to carry GNG in their own right if they're the best you can do for sources), two directory entries which cannot support notability at all, and one article on a non-notable blog. I actually have heard of the guy's prior band before, so I made an especially concerted WP:BEFORE effort to find the degree of sourcing necessary to save this, on the grounds that if I as a Canadian have heard of a small independent American band before then surely more substantive media coverage must exist somewhere because how else could I possibly ever have heard of them in the first place -- but I came up completely dry no matter where I turned, and nothing here constitutes enough notability to grant him an exemption from having to be sourced better than this. Unfortunately it's a delete, albeit without prejudice against recreation in the future if better sourcing can actually be found somewhere. Bearcat ( talk) 00:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
You are deleting references in hope of deleting a page you are obviously very jealous of. Someday gay men will realize that they need to support each other instead of tear each other down at every turn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.132.156.68 ( talk) 18:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The article now has been greatly improved with links and references. Internal and external. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.132.156.68 ( talk) 20:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Sad how the only people on here trying to delete this page are bitchy uptight gay men. We all know that the only people they support are women...almost without exception. Interesting that there are absolutely no straight people protesting this. Btw, this page is already available in a couple languages...and let's not forget his press in Australia's Blue and DNA magazines...in GAB in Germany...on the cover of QX in London...articles in Brazil...etc. He certainly deserves this small mention of a page. If Wikipedia is indeed a reputable source in itself....this controversial page will stay up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaddyDog11 ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 13 March 2016 (UTC) — DaddyDog11 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
"Gay activist" has now been removed so all of you can relax. He does not represent you. Trust me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.132.156.68 ( talk) 07:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and very little adequate sourcing to meet WP:GNG. Of the sources here, we have two articles in alt-weeklies (which would be acceptable amid a diversity of solid sourcing, but are not widely distributed enough to carry GNG in their own right if they're the best you can do for sources), two directory entries which cannot support notability at all, and one article on a non-notable blog. I actually have heard of the guy's prior band before, so I made an especially concerted WP:BEFORE effort to find the degree of sourcing necessary to save this, on the grounds that if I as a Canadian have heard of a small independent American band before then surely more substantive media coverage must exist somewhere because how else could I possibly ever have heard of them in the first place -- but I came up completely dry no matter where I turned, and nothing here constitutes enough notability to grant him an exemption from having to be sourced better than this. Unfortunately it's a delete, albeit without prejudice against recreation in the future if better sourcing can actually be found somewhere. Bearcat ( talk) 00:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
You are deleting references in hope of deleting a page you are obviously very jealous of. Someday gay men will realize that they need to support each other instead of tear each other down at every turn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.132.156.68 ( talk) 18:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The article now has been greatly improved with links and references. Internal and external. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.132.156.68 ( talk) 20:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Sad how the only people on here trying to delete this page are bitchy uptight gay men. We all know that the only people they support are women...almost without exception. Interesting that there are absolutely no straight people protesting this. Btw, this page is already available in a couple languages...and let's not forget his press in Australia's Blue and DNA magazines...in GAB in Germany...on the cover of QX in London...articles in Brazil...etc. He certainly deserves this small mention of a page. If Wikipedia is indeed a reputable source in itself....this controversial page will stay up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaddyDog11 ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 13 March 2016 (UTC) — DaddyDog11 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
"Gay activist" has now been removed so all of you can relax. He does not represent you. Trust me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.132.156.68 ( talk) 07:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)