The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus herein from this dated discussion is for article retention and for this discussion to be closed. (
Non-administrator closure)
NorthAmerica1000 00:16, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Basically a personal biography with references. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
MeAbFab (
talk •
contribs) 16:21, 9 April 2014
Keep Although the biography needs severe-editing and looks like it's been copied from the actor's website, Kelly Mantle has the film and TV credits to establish notability. Mantle also has the references/citations to establish it. The article is just in the need of clean-up.
Burnberrytree (
talk) 16:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I agree with Burnberrytree it should stay — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Firemoss1 (
talk •
contribs) 07:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I agree with both users that this page should stay. Mantle has the notoriety, and the credibility to establish and maintain this page. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Yazzy666 (
talk •
contribs) 19:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC) —
Yazzy666 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Comment. This AFD was started almost two months ago but never appeared on the main AFD page, meaning only people interested in the subject of the article were aware of it, resulting in low discussion participation and possibly a biased result. I'm moving it to the main AFD page now so it can have its full 7 days of the entire community's attention. I take no position on whether the article should be deleted or not.
Angr (
talk) 13:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Procedural closure Given the circumstance of how this was nominated but never appeared on the AFD page for nearly 2 months (isn't there a bot that prevents that from happening?). Only people that have edited this article have voted making this discussion biased. I suggest closure and re-nominating.
JayJayWhat did I do? 18:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)reply
That seems awfully bureaucratic to me. It's on the AFD page now, so other people have a chance to make their opinions heard.
Angr (
talk) 18:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus herein from this dated discussion is for article retention and for this discussion to be closed. (
Non-administrator closure)
NorthAmerica1000 00:16, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Basically a personal biography with references. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
MeAbFab (
talk •
contribs) 16:21, 9 April 2014
Keep Although the biography needs severe-editing and looks like it's been copied from the actor's website, Kelly Mantle has the film and TV credits to establish notability. Mantle also has the references/citations to establish it. The article is just in the need of clean-up.
Burnberrytree (
talk) 16:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I agree with Burnberrytree it should stay — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Firemoss1 (
talk •
contribs) 07:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I agree with both users that this page should stay. Mantle has the notoriety, and the credibility to establish and maintain this page. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Yazzy666 (
talk •
contribs) 19:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC) —
Yazzy666 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Comment. This AFD was started almost two months ago but never appeared on the main AFD page, meaning only people interested in the subject of the article were aware of it, resulting in low discussion participation and possibly a biased result. I'm moving it to the main AFD page now so it can have its full 7 days of the entire community's attention. I take no position on whether the article should be deleted or not.
Angr (
talk) 13:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Procedural closure Given the circumstance of how this was nominated but never appeared on the AFD page for nearly 2 months (isn't there a bot that prevents that from happening?). Only people that have edited this article have voted making this discussion biased. I suggest closure and re-nominating.
JayJayWhat did I do? 18:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)reply
That seems awfully bureaucratic to me. It's on the AFD page now, so other people have a chance to make their opinions heard.
Angr (
talk) 18:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.