The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete as I found nothing better than
this and
this and I'm simply not seeing anything for a better article.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)reply
strong delete obvious AUTOBIO. created by an editor who has only worked on this article and tried to create an article about her company.
LibStar (
talk) 12:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Subject has written about industry in the
Guardian and been referenced in the
FT - recommend article to be developed further rather than deleted
cg6237 (
talk) 22:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)reply
she is not the subject of the article in the 2nd source and only rates a small mention.
LibStar (
talk) 06:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Subject has written two business books featuring excellent reviews on Amazon
[1][2]and been interviewed twice about entrepreneurship on BBC Radio 4
[3][4] - recommend article to be developed further rather than deleted — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
82.7.163.196 (
talk) 17:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - I'm not sure of what qualifies 'dubious notability'? She has two very well received books available to purchase on Amazon and has been interviewed by a prestigious BBC Radio show. I recommend that the article is developed further as required by administrators than deleted completely. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
217.33.146.130 (
talk) 09:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - SPA editors aside, this is a promotional piece about a non-notable individual. Searches turned up nothing to show they pass
WP:GNG. And thanks for the chuckle,
Yeti Hunter - hadn't heard about that "law".
Onel5969TT me 18:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete as I found nothing better than
this and
this and I'm simply not seeing anything for a better article.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)reply
strong delete obvious AUTOBIO. created by an editor who has only worked on this article and tried to create an article about her company.
LibStar (
talk) 12:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Subject has written about industry in the
Guardian and been referenced in the
FT - recommend article to be developed further rather than deleted
cg6237 (
talk) 22:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)reply
she is not the subject of the article in the 2nd source and only rates a small mention.
LibStar (
talk) 06:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Subject has written two business books featuring excellent reviews on Amazon
[1][2]and been interviewed twice about entrepreneurship on BBC Radio 4
[3][4] - recommend article to be developed further rather than deleted — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
82.7.163.196 (
talk) 17:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - I'm not sure of what qualifies 'dubious notability'? She has two very well received books available to purchase on Amazon and has been interviewed by a prestigious BBC Radio show. I recommend that the article is developed further as required by administrators than deleted completely. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
217.33.146.130 (
talk) 09:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - SPA editors aside, this is a promotional piece about a non-notable individual. Searches turned up nothing to show they pass
WP:GNG. And thanks for the chuckle,
Yeti Hunter - hadn't heard about that "law".
Onel5969TT me 18:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.