- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 16:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kana Yume
- Kana Yume ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO or WP:NACTOR. 20th placement in a fan-based poll is not a claim of significance; nn as a member of a music band either since the group includes dozens and hundreds of rotating current and former members. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, interviews, commercial websites and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. K.e.coffman ( talk) 18:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete lack of reliable source coverage. The fact that we have over 50 times as many articles on Japnese pornographic film actressres than Japanese female judges is a true travesty. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:23, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 16:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kana Yume
- Kana Yume ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO or WP:NACTOR. 20th placement in a fan-based poll is not a claim of significance; nn as a member of a music band either since the group includes dozens and hundreds of rotating current and former members. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, interviews, commercial websites and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. K.e.coffman ( talk) 18:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete lack of reliable source coverage. The fact that we have over 50 times as many articles on Japnese pornographic film actressres than Japanese female judges is a true travesty. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:23, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.