The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of (or, frankly, the existence of, although I'm sure he did exist) this non-living astrologer. Additional sources welcomed.
j⚛e deckertalk 05:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete It is high time we clear out all unsourced articles from Wikipedia.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 17:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of (or, frankly, the existence of, although I'm sure he did exist) this non-living astrologer. Additional sources welcomed.
j⚛e deckertalk 05:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete It is high time we clear out all unsourced articles from Wikipedia.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 17:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.