The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Defunct small-town station with no secondary sources. Fails
WP:GNG. Redirect is unnecessary as the disambiguator of (Shoshoni, Wyoming) makes it an implausibly specific search term.
AusLondonder (
talk) 21:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete This is one I'm okay with. I checked for sources (like
you're supposed to), and couldn't locate anything notable. Plus, the station signed back on as KUDA on a different frequency. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả •
Talk •
I DX for fun! 22:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Hence I'm fine with it. All I ask is due diligence before pushing the AfD button. I would appreciate a template first, so that the article can be improved. If no sources can be found, so be it, it can be deleted. I just hope there isn't a vendetta here. I've put in many hours trying to beef up sources in radio station articles, and I'm just hoping they don't go to waste for nefarious reasons. As I've said many times before, I don't own these articles, but I will defend any licensed broadcast station where legitimate third-party sources can be found. See
KCUW-LP and
KBGN for examples. A lot of work went into those. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả •
Talk •
I DX for fun! 22:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Subject does not have the sourcing to meet the
WP:GNG. Implausible search term for a redirect.
Let'srun (
talk) 23:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: An obvious remnant article of the looser inclusion "standards" that this topic area had prior to 2021, which were largely based more on existence (which neither
proves nor
is notability) than on sourcing, much less the clearly-lacking-here
significant coverage. The disambiguator makes any redirect impractical, particularly when there isn't much reason to retain the article history anyway. WCQuidditch☎✎ 02:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
List of radio stations in Wyoming as
WP:ATD. Why would KUDA be an unlikely search term? Also there are 57 incoming links. I assume most of these are from templates, but who's going to check for real ones. Wouldn't it be
WP:CHEAPER to redirect? ~
Kvng (
talk) 14:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG, no reliable sources on the article and no hits online, FCC source is not great for demonstrating notability.
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs) 13:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not only is the article poorly sourced, the subject itself lack sources. It clearly doesn't meet
WP:GNG.
ZyphorianNexus (
talk) 01:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Defunct small-town station with no secondary sources. Fails
WP:GNG. Redirect is unnecessary as the disambiguator of (Shoshoni, Wyoming) makes it an implausibly specific search term.
AusLondonder (
talk) 21:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete This is one I'm okay with. I checked for sources (like
you're supposed to), and couldn't locate anything notable. Plus, the station signed back on as KUDA on a different frequency. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả •
Talk •
I DX for fun! 22:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Hence I'm fine with it. All I ask is due diligence before pushing the AfD button. I would appreciate a template first, so that the article can be improved. If no sources can be found, so be it, it can be deleted. I just hope there isn't a vendetta here. I've put in many hours trying to beef up sources in radio station articles, and I'm just hoping they don't go to waste for nefarious reasons. As I've said many times before, I don't own these articles, but I will defend any licensed broadcast station where legitimate third-party sources can be found. See
KCUW-LP and
KBGN for examples. A lot of work went into those. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả •
Talk •
I DX for fun! 22:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Subject does not have the sourcing to meet the
WP:GNG. Implausible search term for a redirect.
Let'srun (
talk) 23:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: An obvious remnant article of the looser inclusion "standards" that this topic area had prior to 2021, which were largely based more on existence (which neither
proves nor
is notability) than on sourcing, much less the clearly-lacking-here
significant coverage. The disambiguator makes any redirect impractical, particularly when there isn't much reason to retain the article history anyway. WCQuidditch☎✎ 02:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
List of radio stations in Wyoming as
WP:ATD. Why would KUDA be an unlikely search term? Also there are 57 incoming links. I assume most of these are from templates, but who's going to check for real ones. Wouldn't it be
WP:CHEAPER to redirect? ~
Kvng (
talk) 14:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG, no reliable sources on the article and no hits online, FCC source is not great for demonstrating notability.
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs) 13:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not only is the article poorly sourced, the subject itself lack sources. It clearly doesn't meet
WP:GNG.
ZyphorianNexus (
talk) 01:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.