The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No sources found in brief
WP:BEFORE search, so it fails
WP:GNG. I lack the knowledge to judge whether the subject "has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline" per
WP:NPROF. However, even if notability can be established by that criteria, I don't think there are sufficient sources for us to write an article that satisfies
WP:V.
Daask (
talk)
18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep (see below) -- multiple sources attest to being the winner of India's highest award for medical science, the Dr. B. C. Roy Award, awards from the Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, and other positions that clearly pass multiple
WP:PROF categories. Documenting and verifying Indian professorial records can be difficult, but this one seems quite clear. --
Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert(talk)19:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete - I can't find any sources to attest to being the winner of the Dr. B.C. Roy Award in 1986 as claimed in the article and per the
Dr. B. C. Roy Award page itself, the 1986 award went to Jagjit Singh Chopra with a citation. The other claims and sources mentioned above are not included in the article as of this writing, a basic Google search of the name does not return any mention of said awards besides the textbooks, and the sources that are there are primary and the tone overall does not seem neutral. I think it's possible that this could be noteworthy and meet NPROF but at the moment it does not.
Kazamzam (
talk)
14:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete -- Changed !vote from above.
Kazamzam convinced me to look harder at the B.C. Roy Award claim again (the website was down the first time I looked) and indeed I cannot source it outside of claims from the author. (Thanks Kazamzam!) With that gone, I don't see sufficient notability. Since I was the only "Keep" vote, I think
Wcquidditch can end the relist and close as delete. --
Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert(talk)20:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No sources found in brief
WP:BEFORE search, so it fails
WP:GNG. I lack the knowledge to judge whether the subject "has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline" per
WP:NPROF. However, even if notability can be established by that criteria, I don't think there are sufficient sources for us to write an article that satisfies
WP:V.
Daask (
talk)
18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep (see below) -- multiple sources attest to being the winner of India's highest award for medical science, the Dr. B. C. Roy Award, awards from the Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, and other positions that clearly pass multiple
WP:PROF categories. Documenting and verifying Indian professorial records can be difficult, but this one seems quite clear. --
Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert(talk)19:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete - I can't find any sources to attest to being the winner of the Dr. B.C. Roy Award in 1986 as claimed in the article and per the
Dr. B. C. Roy Award page itself, the 1986 award went to Jagjit Singh Chopra with a citation. The other claims and sources mentioned above are not included in the article as of this writing, a basic Google search of the name does not return any mention of said awards besides the textbooks, and the sources that are there are primary and the tone overall does not seem neutral. I think it's possible that this could be noteworthy and meet NPROF but at the moment it does not.
Kazamzam (
talk)
14:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete -- Changed !vote from above.
Kazamzam convinced me to look harder at the B.C. Roy Award claim again (the website was down the first time I looked) and indeed I cannot source it outside of claims from the author. (Thanks Kazamzam!) With that gone, I don't see sufficient notability. Since I was the only "Keep" vote, I think
Wcquidditch can end the relist and close as delete. --
Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert(talk)20:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.