- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe decker talk 17:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
K. Hari Prasad
AfDs for this article:
- K. Hari Prasad ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article for mid-level executive. No claim of scientific notability--purely an administrator. Trivial unreliable awards; non reliable sources as references. DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Little coverage of this individual in reliable sources. There are three articles from The Hindu in the article; only one affords some brief coverage of an honorary fellowship being awarded [1]. In the other two, and other articles I found online, he is simply providing a quote as a spokesman. Notability has not been established. Drchriswilliams ( talk) 21:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I has consulted with DGG after I found this article and noticed there was still questionability; he has now made changes but there's still questionability and I am not finding anything better. SwisterTwister talk 22:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe decker talk 17:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
K. Hari Prasad
AfDs for this article:
- K. Hari Prasad ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article for mid-level executive. No claim of scientific notability--purely an administrator. Trivial unreliable awards; non reliable sources as references. DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Little coverage of this individual in reliable sources. There are three articles from The Hindu in the article; only one affords some brief coverage of an honorary fellowship being awarded [1]. In the other two, and other articles I found online, he is simply providing a quote as a spokesman. Notability has not been established. Drchriswilliams ( talk) 21:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I has consulted with DGG after I found this article and noticed there was still questionability; he has now made changes but there's still questionability and I am not finding anything better. SwisterTwister talk 22:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.