- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Julius Weinberger
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Julius Weinberger ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not think the independent notice of this character rises to the level of enough coverage to pass WP:ONEEVENT, for example. Getting patents isn't a key to notability. Being part of parapsychology claims in the 1970s seems not a strong attestation of notability either. Perhaps we can briefly mention him in Stanley Krippner, but I'm even skeptical of that. jps ( talk) 18:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Paranormal. jps ( talk) 18:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Julius Weinberger
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Julius Weinberger ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not think the independent notice of this character rises to the level of enough coverage to pass WP:ONEEVENT, for example. Getting patents isn't a key to notability. Being part of parapsychology claims in the 1970s seems not a strong attestation of notability either. Perhaps we can briefly mention him in Stanley Krippner, but I'm even skeptical of that. jps ( talk) 18:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Paranormal. jps ( talk) 18:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.