The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
CSD declined, all this person is famous for is that her boob job was paid for by the NHS. This has generated a lot of references in newspapers, but does not give her lasting notability IMO
Gbawden (
talk) 07:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete ... Since my personal opinions aren't really appropriate here we'll say no evidence of notability!.. –
Davey2010 •
(talk) 15:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:TNT. The subject may be notable, but all the sourcing is tabloidery, nothing in the article is sourced with specificity, and in a short time the article has become a coatrack for BLP violations. There's just barely enough legitimate text to keep this from being an attack page, but we can hope for snow.
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (
talk) 15:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete TNT and pure
WP:ATTACK tone. Unless The Times or some other sober Brit publication can write sanely about her, this can't be salvaged. Nate•(
chatter) 00:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails
WP:BIO as lacking significant coverage in reliable sources.
The Whispering Wind (
talk) 02:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
CSD declined, all this person is famous for is that her boob job was paid for by the NHS. This has generated a lot of references in newspapers, but does not give her lasting notability IMO
Gbawden (
talk) 07:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete ... Since my personal opinions aren't really appropriate here we'll say no evidence of notability!.. –
Davey2010 •
(talk) 15:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:TNT. The subject may be notable, but all the sourcing is tabloidery, nothing in the article is sourced with specificity, and in a short time the article has become a coatrack for BLP violations. There's just barely enough legitimate text to keep this from being an attack page, but we can hope for snow.
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (
talk) 15:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete TNT and pure
WP:ATTACK tone. Unless The Times or some other sober Brit publication can write sanely about her, this can't be salvaged. Nate•(
chatter) 00:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails
WP:BIO as lacking significant coverage in reliable sources.
The Whispering Wind (
talk) 02:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.