From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 22:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Joseph Fuwape

Joseph Fuwape (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks to fail WP:NACADEMICS Dolescum ( talk) 17:32, 8 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra ( talk) 18:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. As vice chancellor (in a system where the nominally higher positions are ceremonial) he appears to pass the "highest-level academic post" subclause of WP:PROF#C8. However I am highly dubious that Salem University, Lokoja would count as a "major academic institution" as required by the rest of that criterion. In particular, this source shows it as being both small and new. So I think we will have to look to other criteria for notability. — David Eppstein ( talk) 18:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep Weak DeleteNeutral. per WP:PROF#C8. I will go with a Weak delete until an independent source is provided that documents him delivering a speech as the VC. All the references currently present are promotional primary sources sounding like a resume. Isakaba ( talk) 19:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Based on the independent source provided by Wikicology, that vaguely mentions him as VC in the article. I'd prefer to be nuetral on this one. Isakaba ( talk) 21:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Isakaba, this independent source documents him delivering a speech as the VC. Wikigy t@lk to M£ 22:23, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 00:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Subject of the article obviously meet WP:PROF#C6. The size of the university and its age doesn't count, since there are sources that establish the existence of the university. Wikigy t@lk to M£ 21:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC) reply
    • How is this argument different from WP:ITEXISTS? And clearly size is relevant since an indicator of size ("major") is built into the statement of that WP:PROF criterion. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply
The "Major" in WP:PROF#C6 doesn't refers to "Size", that might be your own personal interpretation. In my own interpretation, it means a duly accredited and approved degree awarding university by the National Universities Commission (in Nigeria, for example). Wikigy t@lk to M£ 13:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Your argument and references establishes the fact that Salem University is an accredited university, but says nothing about this professor in question. Maybe you should try finding sources about this don and not the school. Notability can not be inherited from the school to the VC. Isakaba ( talk) 20:58, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Isakaba, WP:NOTINHERITED does not applies here. The professor in question is the Vice-Chancellor of the university, which made him to clearly passes WP:PROF#C6 which stipulated that a person may be notable if The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
  • Criterion 6 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has held the post of President or Chancellor (or Vice-Chancellor in countries where this is the top academic post) of a significant accredited college or university. Wikigy t@lk to M£ 22:23, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply

 Comment: – "Prominent tenured professors tend to be kept" per WP:PEOPLEOUTCOMES. Wikigy t@lk to M£ 22:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 22:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Joseph Fuwape

Joseph Fuwape (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks to fail WP:NACADEMICS Dolescum ( talk) 17:32, 8 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra ( talk) 18:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. As vice chancellor (in a system where the nominally higher positions are ceremonial) he appears to pass the "highest-level academic post" subclause of WP:PROF#C8. However I am highly dubious that Salem University, Lokoja would count as a "major academic institution" as required by the rest of that criterion. In particular, this source shows it as being both small and new. So I think we will have to look to other criteria for notability. — David Eppstein ( talk) 18:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep Weak DeleteNeutral. per WP:PROF#C8. I will go with a Weak delete until an independent source is provided that documents him delivering a speech as the VC. All the references currently present are promotional primary sources sounding like a resume. Isakaba ( talk) 19:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Based on the independent source provided by Wikicology, that vaguely mentions him as VC in the article. I'd prefer to be nuetral on this one. Isakaba ( talk) 21:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Isakaba, this independent source documents him delivering a speech as the VC. Wikigy t@lk to M£ 22:23, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 00:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Subject of the article obviously meet WP:PROF#C6. The size of the university and its age doesn't count, since there are sources that establish the existence of the university. Wikigy t@lk to M£ 21:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC) reply
    • How is this argument different from WP:ITEXISTS? And clearly size is relevant since an indicator of size ("major") is built into the statement of that WP:PROF criterion. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply
The "Major" in WP:PROF#C6 doesn't refers to "Size", that might be your own personal interpretation. In my own interpretation, it means a duly accredited and approved degree awarding university by the National Universities Commission (in Nigeria, for example). Wikigy t@lk to M£ 13:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Your argument and references establishes the fact that Salem University is an accredited university, but says nothing about this professor in question. Maybe you should try finding sources about this don and not the school. Notability can not be inherited from the school to the VC. Isakaba ( talk) 20:58, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Isakaba, WP:NOTINHERITED does not applies here. The professor in question is the Vice-Chancellor of the university, which made him to clearly passes WP:PROF#C6 which stipulated that a person may be notable if The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
  • Criterion 6 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has held the post of President or Chancellor (or Vice-Chancellor in countries where this is the top academic post) of a significant accredited college or university. Wikigy t@lk to M£ 22:23, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply

 Comment: – "Prominent tenured professors tend to be kept" per WP:PEOPLEOUTCOMES. Wikigy t@lk to M£ 22:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook