- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Joseph Dyas
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joseph Dyas ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Non-notable soldier. Lettler hello • contribs 18:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 18:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 18:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 18:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lettler hello • contribs 16:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lettler hello • contribs 16:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete not even close to meeting our notability guidelines for soldiers. I applaud the nominator for doing the work to review this article, too often with articles on people in the 19th-century people just assume because we have information the person is for sure notable, which is not actually the case. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Joseph Dyas
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joseph Dyas ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Non-notable soldier. Lettler hello • contribs 18:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 18:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 18:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 18:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lettler hello • contribs 16:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lettler hello • contribs 16:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete not even close to meeting our notability guidelines for soldiers. I applaud the nominator for doing the work to review this article, too often with articles on people in the 19th-century people just assume because we have information the person is for sure notable, which is not actually the case. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.