From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, as issue that brought article to AfD has been addressed. ( non-admin closure) Singularity42 ( talk) 20:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Jorrit van der Kooi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD. Seemed to be a weak WP:BLP1E (subject interviewed a person, and the person interviewed was shot on a later date, survived, and speculated it might have been due to the interview?). Editor who disputed PROD pointed out there is a corresponding article on the Dutch Wikipedia, but that other article has no reliable sources noted and none can be found by a Google search). Singularity42 ( talk) 13:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

*Delete per WP:TNT without prejudice against re-creation. Kudos to Singularity42 for nominating! While Van der Kooi may be notable (for example he was kept in the nlwiki AfD-like procedure), this article is written with a focus on the death of Elvis Presley. An extremely obscure and random connection is the center piece and clearly the motivation behind this article. In other words, this Dutch media BLP was hijacked and should be (as-is) deleted. I did not find a great redirect target. CERTAINLY it should not be redirected to anything related to the death of Presley! gidonb ( talk) 15:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC) An anonymous editor resolved my main concern. gidonb ( talk) 19:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, as issue that brought article to AfD has been addressed. ( non-admin closure) Singularity42 ( talk) 20:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Jorrit van der Kooi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD. Seemed to be a weak WP:BLP1E (subject interviewed a person, and the person interviewed was shot on a later date, survived, and speculated it might have been due to the interview?). Editor who disputed PROD pointed out there is a corresponding article on the Dutch Wikipedia, but that other article has no reliable sources noted and none can be found by a Google search). Singularity42 ( talk) 13:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

*Delete per WP:TNT without prejudice against re-creation. Kudos to Singularity42 for nominating! While Van der Kooi may be notable (for example he was kept in the nlwiki AfD-like procedure), this article is written with a focus on the death of Elvis Presley. An extremely obscure and random connection is the center piece and clearly the motivation behind this article. In other words, this Dutch media BLP was hijacked and should be (as-is) deleted. I did not find a great redirect target. CERTAINLY it should not be redirected to anything related to the death of Presley! gidonb ( talk) 15:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC) An anonymous editor resolved my main concern. gidonb ( talk) 19:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook