- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep, withdrawn. — Cryptic 01:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Jonathan Rapping
- Jonathan Rapping ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable per WP:BIO Deunanknute ( talk) 03:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Notable as an academic: See, e.g.,
2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
For the purposes of Criterion 2, major academic awards, such as the Nobel Prize, MacArthur Fellowship, the Fields Medal, the Bancroft Prize, the Pulitzer Prize for History, etc., always qualify under Criterion 2.
I deleted you headline because your claim is frivolous User talk:dghavens 03:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
You did not provide a discussion or even a proper citation. Rather, you made a conclusory claim with no merit when the article clearly meets notability. User talk:dghavens 03:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I apologize, I mistyped "MacArthur Fellowship" and did not realize it qualified someone for an article. Deunanknute ( talk) 03:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 14:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 14:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Law-related deletion discussions.
B E C K Y S A Y L E S 14:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - No proper argument for deletion and it satisfies WP:ACADEMIC. For the purposes of Criterion 2, major academic awards, such as the Nobel Prize, MacArthur Fellowship, the Fields Medal, the Bancroft Prize, the Pulitzer Prize for History, etc., always qualify under Criterion 2. JTdale Talk~ 15:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep, withdrawn. — Cryptic 01:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Jonathan Rapping
- Jonathan Rapping ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable per WP:BIO Deunanknute ( talk) 03:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Notable as an academic: See, e.g.,
2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
For the purposes of Criterion 2, major academic awards, such as the Nobel Prize, MacArthur Fellowship, the Fields Medal, the Bancroft Prize, the Pulitzer Prize for History, etc., always qualify under Criterion 2.
I deleted you headline because your claim is frivolous User talk:dghavens 03:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
You did not provide a discussion or even a proper citation. Rather, you made a conclusory claim with no merit when the article clearly meets notability. User talk:dghavens 03:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I apologize, I mistyped "MacArthur Fellowship" and did not realize it qualified someone for an article. Deunanknute ( talk) 03:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 14:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 14:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Law-related deletion discussions.
B E C K Y S A Y L E S 14:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - No proper argument for deletion and it satisfies WP:ACADEMIC. For the purposes of Criterion 2, major academic awards, such as the Nobel Prize, MacArthur Fellowship, the Fields Medal, the Bancroft Prize, the Pulitzer Prize for History, etc., always qualify under Criterion 2. JTdale Talk~ 15:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.