- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Jonathan Mayhew Wainwright (1821–1863)
- Jonathan Mayhew Wainwright (1821–1863) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SOLDIER. The Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography entry linked at the bottom is primarily about his father. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - ships named in his honor - see USS Wainwright. Non-notable people do not get U.S. Navy vessels named after them. —Мандичка YO 😜 08:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 18:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 18:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 18:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 18:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Junior officer. No special notability. Having a ship named after you is not necessarily proof of anything, especially when the ships are named after the whole family. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:06, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? Does the Royal Navy name ships after random non-notable people? Do they just draw names? That's not how it happens in the United States.
—Мандичка
YO 😜 22:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The Royal Navy actually almost never names ships after people at all. Only Royals and senior military commanders. Many American ships are in fact named after people who aren't really very notable in a Wikipedia sense. Just because the ship is notable doesn't mean its namesake is. Forgetting for a moment that they named a ship after his family, take a look at this chap's bio and tell me why exactly he is notable. A lieutenant who was killed in action, that's all. There are many, many thousands just like him. He is not himself notable. The family as a whole may be notable as one that produced several officers, but individual members (except the admiral, of course) are not. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? Does the Royal Navy name ships after random non-notable people? Do they just draw names? That's not how it happens in the United States.
—Мандичка
YO 😜 22:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Weak keep -- How far down the ranks do we treat people as notable? Captain of a capital ship might just qualify to my mind, but I do not commonly edit in this area. The series of US ships are probably named for him (as a captain killed in action), which may point to some notability in the eyes of those who choose names. We have a series of AFDs on this family: if we keep anyone beyond the WWII general, it should be him. Peterkingiron ( talk) 11:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The three ship articles explicitly state they were named after three, four and finally five family members, otherwise they would have been named the USS Jonathan Wainwright rather than just Wainwright. Captains of capital ships definitely don't qualify on their own; you have to be an admiral for an automatic pass. Clarityfiend ( talk) 12:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- In any case, a revenue cutter is most certainly not a capital ship! Lieutenants do not command capital ships! Captains command capital ships. And as Clarityfiend says, even they are not inherently notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, I always expect that there will be articles about ship namesakes, at a minimum so that the persons details don't have to be discussed in each of the three ships that were named partly for him. In general, if a navy names a ship (or 3 ships) after someone (or several persons who were equally noteworthy at the time of the naming), they are almost certainly notable. Additionally, he is mentioned individually, with several paragraphs, in Johnson, Rossiter (1904). The Twentieth Century Biographical Dictionary of Notable Americans. The Biographical Society of Boston. He was a "Notable American". -- Dual Freq ( talk) 14:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge to the ship article(s), not notable per WP:GNG, lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. Peacemaker67 ( crack... thump) 22:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein 14:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein 14:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG and SOLDIER. No significant coverage of him as a person. Jbh Talk 11:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Jonathan Mayhew Wainwright (1821–1863)
- Jonathan Mayhew Wainwright (1821–1863) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SOLDIER. The Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography entry linked at the bottom is primarily about his father. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - ships named in his honor - see USS Wainwright. Non-notable people do not get U.S. Navy vessels named after them. —Мандичка YO 😜 08:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 18:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 18:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 18:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 18:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Junior officer. No special notability. Having a ship named after you is not necessarily proof of anything, especially when the ships are named after the whole family. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:06, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? Does the Royal Navy name ships after random non-notable people? Do they just draw names? That's not how it happens in the United States.
—Мандичка
YO 😜 22:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The Royal Navy actually almost never names ships after people at all. Only Royals and senior military commanders. Many American ships are in fact named after people who aren't really very notable in a Wikipedia sense. Just because the ship is notable doesn't mean its namesake is. Forgetting for a moment that they named a ship after his family, take a look at this chap's bio and tell me why exactly he is notable. A lieutenant who was killed in action, that's all. There are many, many thousands just like him. He is not himself notable. The family as a whole may be notable as one that produced several officers, but individual members (except the admiral, of course) are not. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? Does the Royal Navy name ships after random non-notable people? Do they just draw names? That's not how it happens in the United States.
—Мандичка
YO 😜 22:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Weak keep -- How far down the ranks do we treat people as notable? Captain of a capital ship might just qualify to my mind, but I do not commonly edit in this area. The series of US ships are probably named for him (as a captain killed in action), which may point to some notability in the eyes of those who choose names. We have a series of AFDs on this family: if we keep anyone beyond the WWII general, it should be him. Peterkingiron ( talk) 11:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The three ship articles explicitly state they were named after three, four and finally five family members, otherwise they would have been named the USS Jonathan Wainwright rather than just Wainwright. Captains of capital ships definitely don't qualify on their own; you have to be an admiral for an automatic pass. Clarityfiend ( talk) 12:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- In any case, a revenue cutter is most certainly not a capital ship! Lieutenants do not command capital ships! Captains command capital ships. And as Clarityfiend says, even they are not inherently notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, I always expect that there will be articles about ship namesakes, at a minimum so that the persons details don't have to be discussed in each of the three ships that were named partly for him. In general, if a navy names a ship (or 3 ships) after someone (or several persons who were equally noteworthy at the time of the naming), they are almost certainly notable. Additionally, he is mentioned individually, with several paragraphs, in Johnson, Rossiter (1904). The Twentieth Century Biographical Dictionary of Notable Americans. The Biographical Society of Boston. He was a "Notable American". -- Dual Freq ( talk) 14:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge to the ship article(s), not notable per WP:GNG, lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. Peacemaker67 ( crack... thump) 22:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein 14:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein 14:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG and SOLDIER. No significant coverage of him as a person. Jbh Talk 11:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.