From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that there is significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Davewild ( talk) 07:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Johnny Greaves (boxer) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer. Being a "prolific journeyman" doesn't make him notable, nor does winning just 4 of his 100 fights. Jakejr ( talk) 19:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Clearly his boxing record doesn't make him notable. Being the subject of a documentary supports notability, but nowadays it seems anyone can make a video and get it aired (an exaggeration, but not without some basis). If the documentary can be shown to be notable, I would say Greaves is notable. Papaursa ( talk) 02:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ( Talk) 13:33, 30 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 17:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that there is significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Davewild ( talk) 07:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Johnny Greaves (boxer) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer. Being a "prolific journeyman" doesn't make him notable, nor does winning just 4 of his 100 fights. Jakejr ( talk) 19:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Clearly his boxing record doesn't make him notable. Being the subject of a documentary supports notability, but nowadays it seems anyone can make a video and get it aired (an exaggeration, but not without some basis). If the documentary can be shown to be notable, I would say Greaves is notable. Papaursa ( talk) 02:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ( Talk) 13:33, 30 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 17:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook