- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Johnel-NG ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
completely and utterly non-notable sock spam (see Johnel NG - no meaningful in depth coverage to be found, the only sources in the article and in a deep search are press releases/paid for PRAXIDICAE💕 20:33, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria. Shellwood ( talk) 20:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep There's a few Nigerian music sources like Nigerian Tribune, [1] City People Magazine and [2] BellaNaija I don't know any of these but they're apparently notable publications. This seems like enough to meet gng. The page needs some work but I've cleaned it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gusty Guy ( talk • contribs) 21:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Anyone who looks at these can easily tell they're not reliable sources - they're silly "wiki bio" entries or outright garbage. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep The nominatior's arguments are not convincing. We have two independent publications with reasonably in-depth coverage, and said sources are quality enough to have their own wikipedia pages and are independently notable media. I'm not seeing anything about the publications themselves to indicate they are unreliable, so in the absence of a cogent argument for deletion it's a keep. Just because it was used as a sitelink on wikidata recently doesn't guarantee them non-notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gusty Guy ( talk • contribs) 21:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)(You can only cast one vote, Gusty Guy, I've struck out the duplicate. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC))Keep Nigerian Tribune and BellaNaija are used in many Nigerian Wikipedia articles for verification. Therefore, this subject is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandihub ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)- Delete – Fails GNG, author has undeclared COI and evidently does not appreciate our notability guidelines or AFC process. ClaudineChionh ( talk – contribs) 23:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete — Per Praxidicae, this is a blatant promotional autobiographical piece that fails to satisfy any notability criteria/criterion. Furthermore I believe socking to be a factor here. I’m moving to file an SPI if one hasn’t already been filed. Celestina007 ( talk) 00:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Strong Keep - Per Gusty Guy There is no sign of promotion or autobiography piece. The content in this article are referenced strongly on commonly used Nigerian reliable sources. Grandihub ( talk) 06:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)- Socks blocked. MER-C 10:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and salt - not a good faith attempt to contribute to the encyclopedia as evidenced by the sockpuppetry. I would have speedy deleted this spam, but it would be more beneficial to have an AFD outcome on the books. MER-C 10:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete — fails the general notability guidelines. S1ources are promotional and paid. Reading Beans Talk to the Beans? 16:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - pure spam Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and salt per the sentiments above. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 00:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: Johnel X has now moved this back to draftspace. ClaudineChionh ( talk – contribs) 03:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- The article should be moved back. There is no consensus to draftify from this discussion and the discussion should be allowed to reach its conclusion.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
19:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- I moved the article back and readded the AFD tag that had been removed. Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- The article should be moved back. There is no consensus to draftify from this discussion and the discussion should be allowed to reach its conclusion.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
19:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and salt not-notable and persistent socking. KylieTastic ( talk) 13:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Johnel-NG ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
completely and utterly non-notable sock spam (see Johnel NG - no meaningful in depth coverage to be found, the only sources in the article and in a deep search are press releases/paid for PRAXIDICAE💕 20:33, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria. Shellwood ( talk) 20:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep There's a few Nigerian music sources like Nigerian Tribune, [1] City People Magazine and [2] BellaNaija I don't know any of these but they're apparently notable publications. This seems like enough to meet gng. The page needs some work but I've cleaned it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gusty Guy ( talk • contribs) 21:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Anyone who looks at these can easily tell they're not reliable sources - they're silly "wiki bio" entries or outright garbage. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep The nominatior's arguments are not convincing. We have two independent publications with reasonably in-depth coverage, and said sources are quality enough to have their own wikipedia pages and are independently notable media. I'm not seeing anything about the publications themselves to indicate they are unreliable, so in the absence of a cogent argument for deletion it's a keep. Just because it was used as a sitelink on wikidata recently doesn't guarantee them non-notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gusty Guy ( talk • contribs) 21:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)(You can only cast one vote, Gusty Guy, I've struck out the duplicate. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC))Keep Nigerian Tribune and BellaNaija are used in many Nigerian Wikipedia articles for verification. Therefore, this subject is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandihub ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)- Delete – Fails GNG, author has undeclared COI and evidently does not appreciate our notability guidelines or AFC process. ClaudineChionh ( talk – contribs) 23:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete — Per Praxidicae, this is a blatant promotional autobiographical piece that fails to satisfy any notability criteria/criterion. Furthermore I believe socking to be a factor here. I’m moving to file an SPI if one hasn’t already been filed. Celestina007 ( talk) 00:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Strong Keep - Per Gusty Guy There is no sign of promotion or autobiography piece. The content in this article are referenced strongly on commonly used Nigerian reliable sources. Grandihub ( talk) 06:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)- Socks blocked. MER-C 10:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and salt - not a good faith attempt to contribute to the encyclopedia as evidenced by the sockpuppetry. I would have speedy deleted this spam, but it would be more beneficial to have an AFD outcome on the books. MER-C 10:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete — fails the general notability guidelines. S1ources are promotional and paid. Reading Beans Talk to the Beans? 16:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - pure spam Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and salt per the sentiments above. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 00:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: Johnel X has now moved this back to draftspace. ClaudineChionh ( talk – contribs) 03:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- The article should be moved back. There is no consensus to draftify from this discussion and the discussion should be allowed to reach its conclusion.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
19:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- I moved the article back and readded the AFD tag that had been removed. Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- The article should be moved back. There is no consensus to draftify from this discussion and the discussion should be allowed to reach its conclusion.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
19:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and salt not-notable and persistent socking. KylieTastic ( talk) 13:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.