This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 May 15. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was Keep Unsourced material has been removed in line with OTRS ticket #2009051110022742. Unsourced material should not be added to this article. Seddσn talk 00:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this article ( version as of nomination) for deletion at the request of the subject, per OTRS #2009051110022742. The article lacks sufficient sourcing, the subject is not a public person, the "references" listed are articles written by the subject rather than about him, and given these factors and the subjects' request, I believe the article should be deleted. Daniel ( talk) 03:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Note: Following discussions with Keegan as to the best way to proceed, and after correspondence between Mike Godwin and the subject, I've decided — with Keegan's full consent — to undelete the article, reopen the AfD to let it run its natural course, and archive this section based on the developments in discussion between Mike and the subject. Regards, Daniel ( talk) 01:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC) reply
...and with that, I propose the AfD continue as normal, below. Daniel ( talk) 01:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 May 15. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was Keep Unsourced material has been removed in line with OTRS ticket #2009051110022742. Unsourced material should not be added to this article. Seddσn talk 00:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this article ( version as of nomination) for deletion at the request of the subject, per OTRS #2009051110022742. The article lacks sufficient sourcing, the subject is not a public person, the "references" listed are articles written by the subject rather than about him, and given these factors and the subjects' request, I believe the article should be deleted. Daniel ( talk) 03:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Note: Following discussions with Keegan as to the best way to proceed, and after correspondence between Mike Godwin and the subject, I've decided — with Keegan's full consent — to undelete the article, reopen the AfD to let it run its natural course, and archive this section based on the developments in discussion between Mike and the subject. Regards, Daniel ( talk) 01:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC) reply
...and with that, I propose the AfD continue as normal, below. Daniel ( talk) 01:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC) reply