- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
John Haymond
- John Haymond ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article published by a Coi author (who has blanked his talk page) after it had been turned down at AfC. The reason given was that the "submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability". I also believe he fails WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 20:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - non notable person. Only significant coverage (if even that) is result of WP:SINGLEEVENT resulting from the Judge Judy incident. Other sources found are strictly local [1] or provide no in-depth information or examination of the topic. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 22:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 02:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 02:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 02:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete articles submitted to the article creation project should not be end-runned created, they should be allowed to be created only if approved. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
John Haymond
- John Haymond ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article published by a Coi author (who has blanked his talk page) after it had been turned down at AfC. The reason given was that the "submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability". I also believe he fails WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 20:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - non notable person. Only significant coverage (if even that) is result of WP:SINGLEEVENT resulting from the Judge Judy incident. Other sources found are strictly local [1] or provide no in-depth information or examination of the topic. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 22:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 02:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 02:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 02:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete articles submitted to the article creation project should not be end-runned created, they should be allowed to be created only if approved. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.