- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Joyous! Noise! 20:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
John Baily (priest)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- John Baily (priest) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing on the page to suggest that the subject meets the notability standards for inclusion. Other than being a name in quite a long list of Canons of Windsor, there is nothing I can find to suggest he was a notable priest. JMWt ( talk) 17:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Christianity, and United Kingdom. JMWt ( talk) 17:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - A canon, but that is as far as it goes. Does not meet presumed notability, and neither are there sufficient sources or information to suggest he meets GNG. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk)
- Comment. (1)
Roger mentions the subject (pp. 165-6) as a possible reformer. (2) Fasti Wyndesorienses (which appears to be a biographical dictionary of the deans and canons of Windsor) has something on p. 155, and is cited by Roger, but I can't read it online.
𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (
talk)
16:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- sounds like a mention of a mention. JMWt ( talk) 20:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Joyous! Noise! 20:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
John Baily (priest)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- John Baily (priest) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing on the page to suggest that the subject meets the notability standards for inclusion. Other than being a name in quite a long list of Canons of Windsor, there is nothing I can find to suggest he was a notable priest. JMWt ( talk) 17:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Christianity, and United Kingdom. JMWt ( talk) 17:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - A canon, but that is as far as it goes. Does not meet presumed notability, and neither are there sufficient sources or information to suggest he meets GNG. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk)
- Comment. (1)
Roger mentions the subject (pp. 165-6) as a possible reformer. (2) Fasti Wyndesorienses (which appears to be a biographical dictionary of the deans and canons of Windsor) has something on p. 155, and is cited by Roger, but I can't read it online.
𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (
talk)
16:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- sounds like a mention of a mention. JMWt ( talk) 20:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.