- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Biblio worm 16:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Joe Blackbourn
- Joe Blackbourn ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Well written article, but fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOX. JTtheOG ( talk) 08:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. sst✈ discuss 10:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. sst✈ discuss 10:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails NBOX. And not particularly well written! DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 10:34, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 10:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
KeepWeak delete Writing style doesn't matter but I think he does meet WP:NBOX with respect to his national amateur championship. New Zealand just squeaks in as a viable country but it is on the list. Peter Rehse ( talk) 10:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)- New Zealand clocks in with a single bronze medal at the
World Amateur Boxing Championships. I don't think amateur champions from
Ghana,
Costa Rica and
Pakistan should also be considered notable. It is true that
WP:NBOX should technically let it slide, but the guideline are way too loose and we shouldn't give a fringe article like this leeway.
JTtheOG (
talk) 19:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- I agree I modified my vote. Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- New Zealand clocks in with a single bronze medal at the
World Amateur Boxing Championships. I don't think amateur champions from
Ghana,
Costa Rica and
Pakistan should also be considered notable. It is true that
WP:NBOX should technically let it slide, but the guideline are way too loose and we shouldn't give a fringe article like this leeway.
JTtheOG (
talk) 19:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I think JTtheOG is right, both about the boxing guidelines and that even under those generous guidelines, NZ barely qualifies. At this time I don't see that Blackbourn meets WP:GNG or is a notable boxer. This seems similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julio César Ávalos, where barely meeting the boxing guidelines was deemed insufficient to show notability. Papaursa ( talk) 20:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable boxer and sources do not show signficiant independent coverage. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Biblio worm 16:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Joe Blackbourn
- Joe Blackbourn ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Well written article, but fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOX. JTtheOG ( talk) 08:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. sst✈ discuss 10:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. sst✈ discuss 10:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails NBOX. And not particularly well written! DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 10:34, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 10:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
KeepWeak delete Writing style doesn't matter but I think he does meet WP:NBOX with respect to his national amateur championship. New Zealand just squeaks in as a viable country but it is on the list. Peter Rehse ( talk) 10:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)- New Zealand clocks in with a single bronze medal at the
World Amateur Boxing Championships. I don't think amateur champions from
Ghana,
Costa Rica and
Pakistan should also be considered notable. It is true that
WP:NBOX should technically let it slide, but the guideline are way too loose and we shouldn't give a fringe article like this leeway.
JTtheOG (
talk) 19:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- I agree I modified my vote. Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- New Zealand clocks in with a single bronze medal at the
World Amateur Boxing Championships. I don't think amateur champions from
Ghana,
Costa Rica and
Pakistan should also be considered notable. It is true that
WP:NBOX should technically let it slide, but the guideline are way too loose and we shouldn't give a fringe article like this leeway.
JTtheOG (
talk) 19:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I think JTtheOG is right, both about the boxing guidelines and that even under those generous guidelines, NZ barely qualifies. At this time I don't see that Blackbourn meets WP:GNG or is a notable boxer. This seems similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julio César Ávalos, where barely meeting the boxing guidelines was deemed insufficient to show notability. Papaursa ( talk) 20:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable boxer and sources do not show signficiant independent coverage. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.