The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –
Joe (
talk) 07:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Looks like the link to the CFN team was for 2007's team. I can't find the 2005 team. But even if he was named to that team, it isn't one of the "official" teams so it's given little credence. And this is a punter, one of the least glamorous positions in football. Bottom line is he isn't notable.
Lizard (
talk) 03:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment Sources:
[1][2] (One source stretched to two pages:
[3][4]), (One source stretched to two pages:
[5][6]),
[7][8]. From
nl.newsbank.com: Reporter-Herald ("Kicking the Habit", "For Colorado State, Jimmie Kaylor stands alone" - the title of the second article just said "C", so I put the first few words of the article instead), Rocky Mountain News ("RAMS DUO ENDURING BOOT CAMP, KAYLOR, MARK WILL GIVE CSU A NEW LOOK IN KICKING GAME WITH BABCOCK OUT OF PICTURE", "Friendship is added plus to boot, CSU kickers rely on buddy system during up-and-down season"), Longmont Times-Call ("Kaylor a bright spot for Rams Sophomore punter ranks 2nd in nation with 45.87 average"), The Denver Post ("Colorado State football Punter commits to Rams")
WikiOriginal-9 (
talk) 03:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep per the sources provided by WikiOriginal9 and those in the article. These sources comprise significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so as to pass
WP:GNG.
Cbl62 (
talk) 06:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep my first reaction was delete as well, but after digging in to the sources I think there's enough here to pass
WP:GNG. Sure we don't normally keep articles about college punters, but this one seems to have at least some unique press coverage.--
Paul McDonald (
talk) 15:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete coverage is routine and does not rise to the notability levels required.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –
Joe (
talk) 07:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Looks like the link to the CFN team was for 2007's team. I can't find the 2005 team. But even if he was named to that team, it isn't one of the "official" teams so it's given little credence. And this is a punter, one of the least glamorous positions in football. Bottom line is he isn't notable.
Lizard (
talk) 03:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment Sources:
[1][2] (One source stretched to two pages:
[3][4]), (One source stretched to two pages:
[5][6]),
[7][8]. From
nl.newsbank.com: Reporter-Herald ("Kicking the Habit", "For Colorado State, Jimmie Kaylor stands alone" - the title of the second article just said "C", so I put the first few words of the article instead), Rocky Mountain News ("RAMS DUO ENDURING BOOT CAMP, KAYLOR, MARK WILL GIVE CSU A NEW LOOK IN KICKING GAME WITH BABCOCK OUT OF PICTURE", "Friendship is added plus to boot, CSU kickers rely on buddy system during up-and-down season"), Longmont Times-Call ("Kaylor a bright spot for Rams Sophomore punter ranks 2nd in nation with 45.87 average"), The Denver Post ("Colorado State football Punter commits to Rams")
WikiOriginal-9 (
talk) 03:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep per the sources provided by WikiOriginal9 and those in the article. These sources comprise significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so as to pass
WP:GNG.
Cbl62 (
talk) 06:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep my first reaction was delete as well, but after digging in to the sources I think there's enough here to pass
WP:GNG. Sure we don't normally keep articles about college punters, but this one seems to have at least some unique press coverage.--
Paul McDonald (
talk) 15:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete coverage is routine and does not rise to the notability levels required.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.