The result was keep. I see a consensus here to Keep, but clean up, this article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article cites no sources, and does not elaborate on the compositions. There is not enough sourced information on Jim Hall’s compositions, especially as compared to Thelonious Monk and Bill Evans, the only other Modern Jazz composers with a comparable article, to warrant an article Mach61 ( talk) 02:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines.So an expressly non-exclusive criterion. The widespread practice of creating such lists suggests that, if they indeed do not qualify under the "discussed as a group" criterion, there is at least a working editorial consensus that such lists represent another
accepted reason. But I don't think we need to go that far in this case. The Jim Hall (musician) article cites sources that discuss Hall's composing style, which is necessarily a discussion of his compositions
as a group or set, meeting NLIST. (Might be nice to import some of that material to this currently leadless list.) If an individual X is verifiably notable for creating works of type Y, then it would IMO be fairly exceptional if a "List of Ys by X" did not meet the discussed-as-a-group criterion of NLIST, and I don't see any reason to consider this to be such an exception. -- Visviva ( talk) 16:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus here to Keep, but clean up, this article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article cites no sources, and does not elaborate on the compositions. There is not enough sourced information on Jim Hall’s compositions, especially as compared to Thelonious Monk and Bill Evans, the only other Modern Jazz composers with a comparable article, to warrant an article Mach61 ( talk) 02:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines.So an expressly non-exclusive criterion. The widespread practice of creating such lists suggests that, if they indeed do not qualify under the "discussed as a group" criterion, there is at least a working editorial consensus that such lists represent another
accepted reason. But I don't think we need to go that far in this case. The Jim Hall (musician) article cites sources that discuss Hall's composing style, which is necessarily a discussion of his compositions
as a group or set, meeting NLIST. (Might be nice to import some of that material to this currently leadless list.) If an individual X is verifiably notable for creating works of type Y, then it would IMO be fairly exceptional if a "List of Ys by X" did not meet the discussed-as-a-group criterion of NLIST, and I don't see any reason to consider this to be such an exception. -- Visviva ( talk) 16:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)