- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 08:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Jeongmee Yoon
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jeongmee Yoon ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This guy is only in few places in one country. Not worthy of recognition. Reason Rrmmll22 ( talk) 03:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - A quick WP:BEFORE search shows that this artist has shown in numerous international museums and gallerys. The two museum collections are verifiable (and I improved the referencing) therefore she meets criteria #4 of WP:NARTIST, and there is enough coverage of her online to meet WP:GNG. Rrmmll22, you only have made 150 total edits here before this nom, it may be a good idea to become familiar with WP notability criteria before nominating articles for deletion - just a friendly suggestion. The article is a short stub and can be improved, but that is not a reason for deletion. Netherzone ( talk) 09:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Her works was mentioned in The New York Times and other reliable sources. That's not enough for passing WP:GNG? Mahdiar86 ( talk) 21:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Specifically, 2a, for a vexatious nomination. This is a retaliatory AfD, after I nominated Michael Finnerty. The bad faith extends to another AFD for an obviously notable artist that was launched by the nominator in retaliation, Sanlé Sory. Yoon is in two museum collections and her work has been widely covered. She's not a guy, btw. --- Possibly ☎ 05:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep and close - clearly a vexatious and WP:POINTY nomination. St★lwart 111 06:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 08:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Jeongmee Yoon
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jeongmee Yoon ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This guy is only in few places in one country. Not worthy of recognition. Reason Rrmmll22 ( talk) 03:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - A quick WP:BEFORE search shows that this artist has shown in numerous international museums and gallerys. The two museum collections are verifiable (and I improved the referencing) therefore she meets criteria #4 of WP:NARTIST, and there is enough coverage of her online to meet WP:GNG. Rrmmll22, you only have made 150 total edits here before this nom, it may be a good idea to become familiar with WP notability criteria before nominating articles for deletion - just a friendly suggestion. The article is a short stub and can be improved, but that is not a reason for deletion. Netherzone ( talk) 09:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Her works was mentioned in The New York Times and other reliable sources. That's not enough for passing WP:GNG? Mahdiar86 ( talk) 21:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Specifically, 2a, for a vexatious nomination. This is a retaliatory AfD, after I nominated Michael Finnerty. The bad faith extends to another AFD for an obviously notable artist that was launched by the nominator in retaliation, Sanlé Sory. Yoon is in two museum collections and her work has been widely covered. She's not a guy, btw. --- Possibly ☎ 05:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep and close - clearly a vexatious and WP:POINTY nomination. St★lwart 111 06:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.