The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Daniel (
talk) 07:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Jenny Morrison is not notable. Just because you are the wife of a prime minister doesn't make you notable.
JJK2000 (
talk) 03:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Subject clearly satisfies
WP:GNG with significant coverage in independent reliable sources over an extended period. As the 29th
spouse of the prime minister of Australia, 28 of whom have articles, one wonders why Morrison alone should be singled out. (No, this is not an
WP:OSE argument since "identifying articles of the same nature that have been established and continue to exist on Wikipedia may provide extremely important insight into the general concept of notability".)
WWGB (
talk) 05:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep Given that the article includes multiple references to reliable sources on Ms Morrison, it is obvious that WP:BIO is met. As she is the wife of the PM, it can be safely assumed that many more references are available.
Nick-D (
talk) 06:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep The above comments convince me that the subject of this article is certainly notable.
🐔ChicdatBawk to me! 12:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - clearly meets WP:BIO and many more references likely available. This is the second article this user has nominated where there is clear sourcing available - their only argument seems to be
WP:IDONTLIKEIT.
Deus et lex (
talk) 10:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep NOTINHERITED doesn't apply if you pass
WP:GNG, which she clearly does.
SportingFlyerT·C 12:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep BLP subject is a figure of regular attention and controversy in the Australian media. —
JEREMY 04:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Daniel (
talk) 07:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Jenny Morrison is not notable. Just because you are the wife of a prime minister doesn't make you notable.
JJK2000 (
talk) 03:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Subject clearly satisfies
WP:GNG with significant coverage in independent reliable sources over an extended period. As the 29th
spouse of the prime minister of Australia, 28 of whom have articles, one wonders why Morrison alone should be singled out. (No, this is not an
WP:OSE argument since "identifying articles of the same nature that have been established and continue to exist on Wikipedia may provide extremely important insight into the general concept of notability".)
WWGB (
talk) 05:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep Given that the article includes multiple references to reliable sources on Ms Morrison, it is obvious that WP:BIO is met. As she is the wife of the PM, it can be safely assumed that many more references are available.
Nick-D (
talk) 06:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep The above comments convince me that the subject of this article is certainly notable.
🐔ChicdatBawk to me! 12:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - clearly meets WP:BIO and many more references likely available. This is the second article this user has nominated where there is clear sourcing available - their only argument seems to be
WP:IDONTLIKEIT.
Deus et lex (
talk) 10:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep NOTINHERITED doesn't apply if you pass
WP:GNG, which she clearly does.
SportingFlyerT·C 12:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep BLP subject is a figure of regular attention and controversy in the Australian media. —
JEREMY 04:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.