The result was keep. My rationale is basically the same as the closer's comments at Afd3. Mark Arsten ( talk) 16:04, 17 March 2013 (UTC) reply
I have nominated this article for deletion twice before. One debate resulted in delete, and the other resulted in keep. I am nominating it for a fourth time because I feel that enough time has passed to make it clear that this article meets all three criteria of a BLP1E, and should thus be deleted. A lot of the information in the article is only mentioned in local news, uncited, and cited with links that no longer work. This article has become a Pseudo-biography, and I feel that most of the information presented in the article is not encyclopedic. Rogerthat94 ( talk) 08:56, 9 March 2013 (UTC) reply
{{subst:Afd-notice|ARTICLE NAME}}
which was recommended
here. I apologize for doing so incorrectly. I did not intentionally try to mislead anyone and all of my actions have been conducted in good faith. I informed the article's creator, involved admins, and people who voted in favor and against keeping the article in the past in order to have a fair debate.
Rogerthat94 (
talk)
22:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
replyThe result was keep. My rationale is basically the same as the closer's comments at Afd3. Mark Arsten ( talk) 16:04, 17 March 2013 (UTC) reply
I have nominated this article for deletion twice before. One debate resulted in delete, and the other resulted in keep. I am nominating it for a fourth time because I feel that enough time has passed to make it clear that this article meets all three criteria of a BLP1E, and should thus be deleted. A lot of the information in the article is only mentioned in local news, uncited, and cited with links that no longer work. This article has become a Pseudo-biography, and I feel that most of the information presented in the article is not encyclopedic. Rogerthat94 ( talk) 08:56, 9 March 2013 (UTC) reply
{{subst:Afd-notice|ARTICLE NAME}}
which was recommended
here. I apologize for doing so incorrectly. I did not intentionally try to mislead anyone and all of my actions have been conducted in good faith. I informed the article's creator, involved admins, and people who voted in favor and against keeping the article in the past in order to have a fair debate.
Rogerthat94 (
talk)
22:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
reply