The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 06:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:PORNBIO with merely nominations. An internet search revealed nothing which would indicate she passes
WP:GNGFinnegas (
talk) 21:21, 15 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator's accurate analysis. No claim to passing PORNBIO; no independent, reliable sourcing.
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (
talk) 22:10, 15 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Fails GNG. Significant reliable source coverage not cited in the article nor found in search.
• Gene93k (
talk) 03:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Please can you explain what policy you are basing the argument that this is a notable pornstar. Its certainly not PORNBIO.
SpartazHumbug! 06:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails PORNBIO without award wins.
Hipocrite (
talk) 20:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete BLPs require substantially better sourcing then this.
SpartazHumbug! 06:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete poor sourcing, no awards that meet requirements, is not notable.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 18:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 06:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:PORNBIO with merely nominations. An internet search revealed nothing which would indicate she passes
WP:GNGFinnegas (
talk) 21:21, 15 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator's accurate analysis. No claim to passing PORNBIO; no independent, reliable sourcing.
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (
talk) 22:10, 15 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Fails GNG. Significant reliable source coverage not cited in the article nor found in search.
• Gene93k (
talk) 03:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Please can you explain what policy you are basing the argument that this is a notable pornstar. Its certainly not PORNBIO.
SpartazHumbug! 06:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails PORNBIO without award wins.
Hipocrite (
talk) 20:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete BLPs require substantially better sourcing then this.
SpartazHumbug! 06:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete poor sourcing, no awards that meet requirements, is not notable.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 18:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.