The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This article appears to read more like an advertisement and not have enough reliable source and this article is not enough notable to stand alone article . NabéTrath ( talk) 06:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This article appears to read more like an advertisement and not have enough reliable source and this article is not enough notable to stand alone article . NabéTrath ( talk) 06:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)