The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Football player and coach who fails NFOOTY (never played in fully-pro league and never head-coached in one) and GNG (Provided sources are from smalltown local papers.) --
BlameRuiner (
talk) 23:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:05, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep, reasonably long experience as assistant in a fully professional league, and while it's true that the
significant coverage mainly comes from the newspapers of his hometown, I'd call it a mid-sized town if anyone were to think that it's a street lined with a couple of buildings.. For these reasons I created the article
Geschichte (
talk) 19:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
In the spirit of discussion, what do you think about my comment above about the documented coverage? That Jalland has been covered significantly in multiple independent sources is not questionable in my eyes.
Geschichte (
talk) 20:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - He didn't manage in an
WP:FPL based league which would make him automatically fail
WP:NFOOTY and
WP:GNG.
HawkAussie (
talk) 00:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
You can't "automatically" fail GNG when you have SIGCOV.
Geschichte (
talk) 08:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Agreed - many people pass GNG but fail NFOOTBALL.
GiantSnowman 13:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:NFOOTY is straightforward in its criteria, and they are not met. Notability could still be established if
WP:BASIC is satisfied, but it is not, coverage is only trivial.
2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546 (
talk) 03:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Football player and coach who fails NFOOTY (never played in fully-pro league and never head-coached in one) and GNG (Provided sources are from smalltown local papers.) --
BlameRuiner (
talk) 23:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:05, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep, reasonably long experience as assistant in a fully professional league, and while it's true that the
significant coverage mainly comes from the newspapers of his hometown, I'd call it a mid-sized town if anyone were to think that it's a street lined with a couple of buildings.. For these reasons I created the article
Geschichte (
talk) 19:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
In the spirit of discussion, what do you think about my comment above about the documented coverage? That Jalland has been covered significantly in multiple independent sources is not questionable in my eyes.
Geschichte (
talk) 20:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - He didn't manage in an
WP:FPL based league which would make him automatically fail
WP:NFOOTY and
WP:GNG.
HawkAussie (
talk) 00:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
You can't "automatically" fail GNG when you have SIGCOV.
Geschichte (
talk) 08:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Agreed - many people pass GNG but fail NFOOTBALL.
GiantSnowman 13:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:NFOOTY is straightforward in its criteria, and they are not met. Notability could still be established if
WP:BASIC is satisfied, but it is not, coverage is only trivial.
2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546 (
talk) 03:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.