The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eagles  24/7  (C) 15:19, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Jamie Howard

Jamie Howard (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search for any WP:SIGCOV turns up empty. Fails WP:NCOLLATH as he has not been the recipient of any notable awards. Fails WP:NBASEBALL as he never made it to the majors. Willsome429 ( say hey or see my edits!) 15:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Willsome429 ( say hey or see my edits!) 15:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Willsome429 ( say hey or see my edits!) 15:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Willsome429 ( say hey or see my edits!) 15:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC) reply

• comment we generally find that starting quarterbacks at top tier programs like LSU tend to generate way more than enough coverage to surpass WP:GNG. The name of this individual may make simple google searches more challenging.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 15:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep subject is notable. Thousands of search results for "'Jamie Howard' lsu" on Newspapers.com for the relevant years including many feature pieces like this one: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/40467301/the_times/. Jweiss11 ( talk) 16:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Jweiss11 and PaulMcDonald. Starting quarterbacks at elite programs like LSU get abundant coverage and Howard is no exception. In addition to the piece linked above, here are a couple more pieces on him: this, this, and this. Cbl62 ( talk) 16:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep Article was undersourced, but easily passes WP:GNG, lots of significant coverage in a newspapers.com search. SportingFlyer T· C 17:42, 12 December 2019 (UTC) reply
• SNOW KEEP based on research found. I suggest we close it now and incorporate the sources into the article (which is nothing more than editing).-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 19:19, 12 December 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep per the sources provided by Jweiss11 and Cbl62. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Ejgreen77 ( talk) 00:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep per sources provided by Cb162 _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep WP:BEFORE reveals WP:NEXIST. Lightburst ( talk) 05:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.