- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Unanimous agreement here even after I discount a sockpuppet argument. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 03:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
James G. Abruzzo
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- James G. Abruzzo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Purely WP:PROMOTIONAL biography of someone who does not pass WP:GNG, potentially written for pay. WP:NOTRESUME. – Muboshgu ( talk) 17:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu ( talk) 17:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu ( talk) 17:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Likely paid-for spam, creator blocked for advertising. MER-C 19:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Oaktree b ( talk) 02:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as per Nom. Niceguylucky ( talk) 08:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not meet notability guidelines Padavalam🌂 ► 16:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, Per nom. looks promotional Alex-h ( talk) 17:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG Devoke water 09:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Unanimous agreement here even after I discount a sockpuppet argument. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 03:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
James G. Abruzzo
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- James G. Abruzzo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Purely WP:PROMOTIONAL biography of someone who does not pass WP:GNG, potentially written for pay. WP:NOTRESUME. – Muboshgu ( talk) 17:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu ( talk) 17:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu ( talk) 17:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Likely paid-for spam, creator blocked for advertising. MER-C 19:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Oaktree b ( talk) 02:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as per Nom. Niceguylucky ( talk) 08:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not meet notability guidelines Padavalam🌂 ► 16:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, Per nom. looks promotional Alex-h ( talk) 17:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG Devoke water 09:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.