The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of a musician and journalist, not
properly referenced as passing our notability criteria for musicians or journalists. The notability claim on offer here is that he and his work exist, and the content is heavily
reference bombed to footnotes of the "music verifying its own existence on Bandcamp, YouTube, Spotify or the self-published websites of himself or his collaborators" and/or "magazine articles where he was the bylined author and not the subject under discussion" varieties, which are not support for notability.
As always, you do not make a person notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia by
primary sourcing his work to itself as proof that it exists -- you make a person notable enough for inclusion by sourcing his work to third party coverage and analysis about his work, in real media independent of himself, as proof that it has been externally validated as significant, but virtually none of the sources here represent
WP:GNG-worthy coverage about him in real media.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of a musician and journalist, not
properly referenced as passing our notability criteria for musicians or journalists. The notability claim on offer here is that he and his work exist, and the content is heavily
reference bombed to footnotes of the "music verifying its own existence on Bandcamp, YouTube, Spotify or the self-published websites of himself or his collaborators" and/or "magazine articles where he was the bylined author and not the subject under discussion" varieties, which are not support for notability.
As always, you do not make a person notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia by
primary sourcing his work to itself as proof that it exists -- you make a person notable enough for inclusion by sourcing his work to third party coverage and analysis about his work, in real media independent of himself, as proof that it has been externally validated as significant, but virtually none of the sources here represent
WP:GNG-worthy coverage about him in real media.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)