The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak keep The subject can be considered notable per
WP:NSOCCER however there's hardy any coverage. I'm leaning towards keep as there's many association football articles that have even less sources but are kept per
WP:NSOCCER.
Less Unless (
talk)
16:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
For referees their officiated international match (matches) is notability item for them even though friendly match. Sol i think this article has no ane reason for delete....
Almgerdeu (
talk)
01:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - referees need to pass
WP:GNG so there needs to be clear and significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. There is no inherent notability for referees just because they have refereed an international friendly fixture.
Spiderone10:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It's not about how many matches he has refereed. It's about whether he is the subject of significant coverage from reliable secondary sources
Spiderone21:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Don't mean to throw a spanner in the works but surely there will be newspaper articles, offline sources. This AfD seems bias towards the online review.
Govvy (
talk)
00:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
There are many, a lot, more more articles as we talked...this article have sources and created and edited correctly (i had mistakes that some users informed me, before)....so i corrected all of them....i did not understand that why this article must delete......
Almgerdeu (
talk)
15:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
All the sources provided are just routine entries in database websites. There isn't any evidence that Hirrle has received
significant coverage. If such sources can be found, please do link them in the article and I am happy to change my vote.
Spiderone16:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak keep The subject can be considered notable per
WP:NSOCCER however there's hardy any coverage. I'm leaning towards keep as there's many association football articles that have even less sources but are kept per
WP:NSOCCER.
Less Unless (
talk)
16:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
For referees their officiated international match (matches) is notability item for them even though friendly match. Sol i think this article has no ane reason for delete....
Almgerdeu (
talk)
01:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - referees need to pass
WP:GNG so there needs to be clear and significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. There is no inherent notability for referees just because they have refereed an international friendly fixture.
Spiderone10:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It's not about how many matches he has refereed. It's about whether he is the subject of significant coverage from reliable secondary sources
Spiderone21:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Don't mean to throw a spanner in the works but surely there will be newspaper articles, offline sources. This AfD seems bias towards the online review.
Govvy (
talk)
00:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
There are many, a lot, more more articles as we talked...this article have sources and created and edited correctly (i had mistakes that some users informed me, before)....so i corrected all of them....i did not understand that why this article must delete......
Almgerdeu (
talk)
15:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
All the sources provided are just routine entries in database websites. There isn't any evidence that Hirrle has received
significant coverage. If such sources can be found, please do link them in the article and I am happy to change my vote.
Spiderone16:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.