From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 03:14, 4 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Jacky Rowland (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly a rather average TV journalist; the only thing she's done, the only thing preventing an A7 speedy deletion, is an award from an educational charity. No evidence of notability, unless I'm missing something. Nyttend ( talk) 14:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. -- Dmol ( talk) 05:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. I'm surprised at this nomination and particularly the suggestion that this bio should be close to being speedily deleted! Please do more reading around before such nominations. I've added a number of sources. Rowland was a long-standing foreign correspondent for the BBC, and has won awards for her reporting with both the BBC and Al Jazeera English - major news organisations. She received a lot of praise for her reporting in Afghanistan and Yugoslavia. Her decision to testify against Milosevic received a lot of attention, it even seems to be a common case study in journalism ethics - take a look at a Google Books search to see this. This is not an "average" TV journalist, and even if she were "average" there is enough commentary on her over the years to satisfy WP:GNG. Fences& Windows 23:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep There's now plenty of sources. Easily passes WP:GNG now. StewdioMACK Talk page 15:34, 21 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 17:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 03:14, 4 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Jacky Rowland (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly a rather average TV journalist; the only thing she's done, the only thing preventing an A7 speedy deletion, is an award from an educational charity. No evidence of notability, unless I'm missing something. Nyttend ( talk) 14:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. -- Dmol ( talk) 05:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. I'm surprised at this nomination and particularly the suggestion that this bio should be close to being speedily deleted! Please do more reading around before such nominations. I've added a number of sources. Rowland was a long-standing foreign correspondent for the BBC, and has won awards for her reporting with both the BBC and Al Jazeera English - major news organisations. She received a lot of praise for her reporting in Afghanistan and Yugoslavia. Her decision to testify against Milosevic received a lot of attention, it even seems to be a common case study in journalism ethics - take a look at a Google Books search to see this. This is not an "average" TV journalist, and even if she were "average" there is enough commentary on her over the years to satisfy WP:GNG. Fences& Windows 23:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep There's now plenty of sources. Easily passes WP:GNG now. StewdioMACK Talk page 15:34, 21 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 17:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook