- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:52, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- JUNTAMURA ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced and, as far as can be told from the barely intelligible content, no real indication of notability Jac16888 Talk 21:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. In the absence of any third-party sources or in-depth coverage, it's hard to see how basic notability has been established here, and the article appears to be a promotional effort. -- DAJF ( talk) 14:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. It is just MT from Japanese, so has zero value. (Anyone who wants MT of the Japanese article can get it; we should not be cluttering up WP with textual junk.) Imaginatorium ( talk) 18:29, 26 August 2014 (UTC) And anyway WP style is to use English capitalisation etc, not Japanese. Since the person's real name is {Tamura, Jun} (permute to taste), it should probably be JunTamura, or Jun Tamura, to normalise the erratic Japanese "style". Imaginatorium ( talk) 18:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:52, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- JUNTAMURA ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced and, as far as can be told from the barely intelligible content, no real indication of notability Jac16888 Talk 21:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. In the absence of any third-party sources or in-depth coverage, it's hard to see how basic notability has been established here, and the article appears to be a promotional effort. -- DAJF ( talk) 14:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. It is just MT from Japanese, so has zero value. (Anyone who wants MT of the Japanese article can get it; we should not be cluttering up WP with textual junk.) Imaginatorium ( talk) 18:29, 26 August 2014 (UTC) And anyway WP style is to use English capitalisation etc, not Japanese. Since the person's real name is {Tamura, Jun} (permute to taste), it should probably be JunTamura, or Jun Tamura, to normalise the erratic Japanese "style". Imaginatorium ( talk) 18:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.