- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JMood Records ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are no specific guidelines for notability for record labels in WP:MUSIC so only WP:NCORP and GNG apply. I did not find any significant coverage of the company. The sources in the article are linked to its own website and the article is majorly an advert. - Harsh 12:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. - Harsh 12:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - Harsh 12:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. - Harsh 12:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
The label is existing and active and its recording artist rooster includes also well known jazz musicians. On the web there are dozens of Cd reviews and links. It's like many other Indie record labels already included in Wikipedia. Thanks 10:47, 29 June 2020. Robmag
- Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. -- Cewbot ( talk) 00:02, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Logs:
2020-03 ✍️ create
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I have really found nothing supporting notability of this record label. It could achieve notability in the future, but it seems to be simply a start-up company. Good for them! But that doesn't qualify for inclusion in this encyclopedia. Notability speaks to WP:IMPACT and I don't see any indicator here--at least, not at this time. Wikipedia is not a directory.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 14:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The first post is cogent and succinct. What's it doing on Wikipedia?
Vmavanti ( talk) 14:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JMood Records ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are no specific guidelines for notability for record labels in WP:MUSIC so only WP:NCORP and GNG apply. I did not find any significant coverage of the company. The sources in the article are linked to its own website and the article is majorly an advert. - Harsh 12:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. - Harsh 12:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - Harsh 12:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. - Harsh 12:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
The label is existing and active and its recording artist rooster includes also well known jazz musicians. On the web there are dozens of Cd reviews and links. It's like many other Indie record labels already included in Wikipedia. Thanks 10:47, 29 June 2020. Robmag
- Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. -- Cewbot ( talk) 00:02, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Logs:
2020-03 ✍️ create
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I have really found nothing supporting notability of this record label. It could achieve notability in the future, but it seems to be simply a start-up company. Good for them! But that doesn't qualify for inclusion in this encyclopedia. Notability speaks to WP:IMPACT and I don't see any indicator here--at least, not at this time. Wikipedia is not a directory.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 14:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The first post is cogent and succinct. What's it doing on Wikipedia?
Vmavanti ( talk) 14:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.