- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Ivet Goranova ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of work in major museums or independent critical analysis of her work. DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 05:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 05:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 05:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. failing WP:ARTIST and promotional tone. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 11:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG, there are not enough sources that provide enough material to support an article. Fails WP:ARTIST as well. No significant collections, no exhibitions in major galleries, no critical reviews. Mduvekot ( talk) 01:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The page is very light on material and the individual is not notable. LucretiaTox ( talk) 12:28, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Ivet Goranova ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of work in major museums or independent critical analysis of her work. DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 05:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 05:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 05:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. failing WP:ARTIST and promotional tone. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 11:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG, there are not enough sources that provide enough material to support an article. Fails WP:ARTIST as well. No significant collections, no exhibitions in major galleries, no critical reviews. Mduvekot ( talk) 01:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The page is very light on material and the individual is not notable. LucretiaTox ( talk) 12:28, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.