The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I see the proposal concerns the deletion of the page of this party, which, although small and short-lived, contributed to the foundation of the MSI... --
Scia Della Cometa (
talk)
21:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - notably notability isn't temporary, if the party was notable albeit for a short period it remains notable. Having a quick glance in google books indicates that there are quite a lot of entries for MIUS. The tumultuous period of transition from WWII fascism to parliamentary neo-fascism seems to have attracted significant scholarly attention. --
Soman (
talk)
12:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge into
Italian Social Movement. There is evidence of notability here though as a stand-alone article things looks far less convincing. The article is a couple of paragraphs which could be merged into a longer article to provide context and detail. As above, the evidence is that the party existed but did not achieve anything notable prior to, or following, elections.
doktorbwordsdeeds07:04, 8 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Italian Social Movement (as there isn't anything sourced worth to merge, and it is already mentioned there). It fails GNG and was never notable on its own. It lasted little over a month, and during this time it was more a virtual entity than a real party/movement. All the sources, including the "lot of entries" mentioned by
Soman, are brief mentions related to the foundation of the
Italian Social Movement, none of them being significant coverage. Also the sources currently in the bibliography are faked as to make it appear the movement was notable: eg.
the link to the book La Destra in Italia: 1945-1969 highlightens 18 citations, but they are citations for fronte dell'italiano. This movement/party is mentioned in the book just once:
[1], and given the nature and the very specific subject of the book, as well as its extensive length (695 pages), if it was really notable it would had been covered in a couple dozen pages. --
151.54.248.238 (
talk)
06:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I see the proposal concerns the deletion of the page of this party, which, although small and short-lived, contributed to the foundation of the MSI... --
Scia Della Cometa (
talk)
21:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - notably notability isn't temporary, if the party was notable albeit for a short period it remains notable. Having a quick glance in google books indicates that there are quite a lot of entries for MIUS. The tumultuous period of transition from WWII fascism to parliamentary neo-fascism seems to have attracted significant scholarly attention. --
Soman (
talk)
12:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge into
Italian Social Movement. There is evidence of notability here though as a stand-alone article things looks far less convincing. The article is a couple of paragraphs which could be merged into a longer article to provide context and detail. As above, the evidence is that the party existed but did not achieve anything notable prior to, or following, elections.
doktorbwordsdeeds07:04, 8 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Italian Social Movement (as there isn't anything sourced worth to merge, and it is already mentioned there). It fails GNG and was never notable on its own. It lasted little over a month, and during this time it was more a virtual entity than a real party/movement. All the sources, including the "lot of entries" mentioned by
Soman, are brief mentions related to the foundation of the
Italian Social Movement, none of them being significant coverage. Also the sources currently in the bibliography are faked as to make it appear the movement was notable: eg.
the link to the book La Destra in Italia: 1945-1969 highlightens 18 citations, but they are citations for fronte dell'italiano. This movement/party is mentioned in the book just once:
[1], and given the nature and the very specific subject of the book, as well as its extensive length (695 pages), if it was really notable it would had been covered in a couple dozen pages. --
151.54.248.238 (
talk)
06:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.