The result was keep. Shimeru ( talk) 01:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC) reply
This topic is not notable and the article is being used as an attack against Israel. Nearly all of the information in the article is in violation of WP:NPOV, down to the very name given for the IDF (changed to IOF). Furthermore, nearly all of the information in the article is WP:OR with no WP:RS. Even if the topic were notable, by the time we removed all the violating text there would be no article left. Breein1007 ( talk) 22:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Here are some WP:RS that discuss the order: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. See e.g. the last two, Le Figaro has returned to the same topic which makes it already less of a one-off. -- Dailycare ( talk) 20:50, 9 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Shimeru ( talk) 01:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC) reply
This topic is not notable and the article is being used as an attack against Israel. Nearly all of the information in the article is in violation of WP:NPOV, down to the very name given for the IDF (changed to IOF). Furthermore, nearly all of the information in the article is WP:OR with no WP:RS. Even if the topic were notable, by the time we removed all the violating text there would be no article left. Breein1007 ( talk) 22:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Here are some WP:RS that discuss the order: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. See e.g. the last two, Le Figaro has returned to the same topic which makes it already less of a one-off. -- Dailycare ( talk) 20:50, 9 May 2010 (UTC) reply