The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Poorly-sourced promo piece on a non-notable writer (?). Sources cited are mostly a mix of articles written by himself, press releases and
churnalism, none of which establishes notability. A search finds just the usual social media accounts etc. Earlier draftification was rejected by the author, and a speedy request was removed by a collaborator, so here we are. Fails
WP:GNG /
WP:AUTHOR. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
08:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. I thought the award for Global Teaching Excellence may be notable, but it turns out that 294 people won that award, so it was clearly not as exclusive as I expected. No further sources found when I looked.
Spiralwidget (
talk)
12:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable. All sources are primary/non-independent, and I couldn't find better ones. Furthermore, I also did some research on these "Global Teaching Excellence Awards", and all I could find were press releases plus their website, which is filled with stock images (a quick reverse image search brings up plenty of other shady "conferences" using the exact same images) and has little to no information other than a nomination fee-- which makes me think that these so-called awards are handed out to anyone who pays for them. Like a fake diploma. Either way, not notable.
Blue Edits (
talk)
08:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Poorly-sourced promo piece on a non-notable writer (?). Sources cited are mostly a mix of articles written by himself, press releases and
churnalism, none of which establishes notability. A search finds just the usual social media accounts etc. Earlier draftification was rejected by the author, and a speedy request was removed by a collaborator, so here we are. Fails
WP:GNG /
WP:AUTHOR. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
08:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. I thought the award for Global Teaching Excellence may be notable, but it turns out that 294 people won that award, so it was clearly not as exclusive as I expected. No further sources found when I looked.
Spiralwidget (
talk)
12:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable. All sources are primary/non-independent, and I couldn't find better ones. Furthermore, I also did some research on these "Global Teaching Excellence Awards", and all I could find were press releases plus their website, which is filled with stock images (a quick reverse image search brings up plenty of other shady "conferences" using the exact same images) and has little to no information other than a nomination fee-- which makes me think that these so-called awards are handed out to anyone who pays for them. Like a fake diploma. Either way, not notable.
Blue Edits (
talk)
08:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.