The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment apologies I realised there had been a PROD and an attempted speedy delete before but failed to spot the previous AfD. However I did look for sources myself today and did not find any of the ones referred to in the previous AfD. Maybe there are Vietnamese sources I’m missing.
Mccapra (
talk)
22:47, 27 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak keep Did have coverage about her and her brand in an interview in
South China Morning Post (included in the previous AfD) the dominant English newspaper in Hong Kong (to bad WSJ Asia edition ceased to publish and no one care China Daily). Despite interview is a primary source and the current state of the wiki article is unsatisfactory.
Matthew hk (
talk)
13:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep The last nomination found significant coverage in reliable sources. Too bad no one expanded the article with them back then. I'll see what I can do now.
DreamFocus15:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)reply
I have added in some references to the article and expanded it a bit with what English language sources were found in the previous AFD.
DreamFocus16:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Withdraw nomination. with thanks to other editors who have found and added sources which I believe now support the notability of the topic.
Mccapra (
talk)
13:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment apologies I realised there had been a PROD and an attempted speedy delete before but failed to spot the previous AfD. However I did look for sources myself today and did not find any of the ones referred to in the previous AfD. Maybe there are Vietnamese sources I’m missing.
Mccapra (
talk)
22:47, 27 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak keep Did have coverage about her and her brand in an interview in
South China Morning Post (included in the previous AfD) the dominant English newspaper in Hong Kong (to bad WSJ Asia edition ceased to publish and no one care China Daily). Despite interview is a primary source and the current state of the wiki article is unsatisfactory.
Matthew hk (
talk)
13:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep The last nomination found significant coverage in reliable sources. Too bad no one expanded the article with them back then. I'll see what I can do now.
DreamFocus15:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)reply
I have added in some references to the article and expanded it a bit with what English language sources were found in the previous AFD.
DreamFocus16:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Withdraw nomination. with thanks to other editors who have found and added sources which I believe now support the notability of the topic.
Mccapra (
talk)
13:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.