The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
KTC (
talk) 03:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Speculation on an unreleased music album.
Oscarthecat (
talk) 12:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Apparently it's been released (according to the
Deuce (singer) article - with the citation needed template), but this is a very poor article and does appear to be speculation. The source originally linked appeared to be a fake 'official' channel containing links to adfly which then linked to iTunes, which doesn't seem like it would be the actual 'official' YouTube of a singer. --Kethrus |
talk to me 13:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep/Redirect I have sources but nobility is my main concern. I have sources and links of downloads to deuces official VK profile were he has been releasing free singles until he is legally cleared for album release. So I vote redirect until more information becomes available.
75Indians75 (
talk) 04:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete The sources that 75Indians75 has are from a social media site, and are not official. Deuce's website is "
http://deucela.com/" while those releases were from "Deuce.com" and are not associated with the artist. It's not the subject's profile that has "released" the album, it's someone who is masquerading as the singer. The fact that Deuce is American and the "official" page on the site lists everything in Russian is another problem. Why doesn't Deuce have links to it on his Facebook page (
https://www.facebook.com/DeuceLA/) or mention it on his official Twitter account (
https://twitter.com/deuce9lives)? There's no entry for it in the iTunes store or Amazon. What we appear to have is a pirated copy being circulated.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 20:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as per
WP:CRYSTAL and
WP:N. When it is officially released and there are multiple secondary reliable sources discussing it, then an article can be created. Or if there is significant discussion in multiple RSs about the album despite it not being released. I wouldn't object to a redir to the artist to hold the history, but I see no real need for it, unless it would help avoid a premature recreation.
DES(talk) 22:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as unreferenced fluff with no context.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 23:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
KTC (
talk) 03:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Speculation on an unreleased music album.
Oscarthecat (
talk) 12:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Apparently it's been released (according to the
Deuce (singer) article - with the citation needed template), but this is a very poor article and does appear to be speculation. The source originally linked appeared to be a fake 'official' channel containing links to adfly which then linked to iTunes, which doesn't seem like it would be the actual 'official' YouTube of a singer. --Kethrus |
talk to me 13:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep/Redirect I have sources but nobility is my main concern. I have sources and links of downloads to deuces official VK profile were he has been releasing free singles until he is legally cleared for album release. So I vote redirect until more information becomes available.
75Indians75 (
talk) 04:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete The sources that 75Indians75 has are from a social media site, and are not official. Deuce's website is "
http://deucela.com/" while those releases were from "Deuce.com" and are not associated with the artist. It's not the subject's profile that has "released" the album, it's someone who is masquerading as the singer. The fact that Deuce is American and the "official" page on the site lists everything in Russian is another problem. Why doesn't Deuce have links to it on his Facebook page (
https://www.facebook.com/DeuceLA/) or mention it on his official Twitter account (
https://twitter.com/deuce9lives)? There's no entry for it in the iTunes store or Amazon. What we appear to have is a pirated copy being circulated.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 20:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as per
WP:CRYSTAL and
WP:N. When it is officially released and there are multiple secondary reliable sources discussing it, then an article can be created. Or if there is significant discussion in multiple RSs about the album despite it not being released. I wouldn't object to a redir to the artist to hold the history, but I see no real need for it, unless it would help avoid a premature recreation.
DES(talk) 22:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as unreferenced fluff with no context.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 23:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.