The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Created as part of a series of questionable edits by a user creating probably non-existent places, and
editing other articles so they corresponded. Tarpon Springs is directly north of Palm Harbor. There is nothing in between. This Innisbrook Resort is In Palm Harbor, which is what the page said before this user messed with it.
Smartyllama (
talk)
17:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment. The current article is bogus, but the USGS says there really is a U6 unincorporated community called Innisbrook at another location in the Palm Harbor, Florida area. GNIS entry:
295375. Otherwise, the article is unverifiable in its current state.
• Gene93k (
talk)
18:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:TNT, my comment above and other similar articles by the same creator. The place may be real but the article one in a series of hoaxes.
• Gene93k (
talk)
19:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator or Merge to
Pinellas County, Florida unless actual sources demonstrating separate notability for this specific spot are shown; entry in
USGS GNIS is not legal recognition and doesn't meet
WP:GEOLAND, and it being "verifiable" just means
WP:ITEXISTS, not
WP:GNG. (Boilerplate I'm using for all these nominations: This is a series of
WP:HOAX articles by
Bnnnperdue (
talk·contribs), each one using a
USGS GNIS entry, then copy-pasted claims from other towns or patently-false claims about being
incorporated or otherwise a legally-autonomous entity or having some other significant history, so that it appears to the casual viewer that
WP:GEOLAND applies or otherwise gives the façade of meeting
WP:GNG, and a mess like this deletion discussion ensues. In each case, the bulk of the article has been fantasy, often provably false, sometimes with alleged locator maps, also invented by Bnnnperdue. USGS GNIS populated place entries only mean that a place with that name was once on a map or reported to exist at some point; lots of USGS GNIS entries have no significant cultural history and don't meet
WP:GNG; for example, many were mere train stops or intersections with few buildings or other activity. Given the creator's hoax history over the last few months, there's no reason to presume that a subject is/was notable; go look at
User talk:Bnnnperdue and
User:Closeapple/issues/User:Bnnnperdue and you'll see what's going on here.) --
Closeapple (
talk)
01:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Created as part of a series of questionable edits by a user creating probably non-existent places, and
editing other articles so they corresponded. Tarpon Springs is directly north of Palm Harbor. There is nothing in between. This Innisbrook Resort is In Palm Harbor, which is what the page said before this user messed with it.
Smartyllama (
talk)
17:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment. The current article is bogus, but the USGS says there really is a U6 unincorporated community called Innisbrook at another location in the Palm Harbor, Florida area. GNIS entry:
295375. Otherwise, the article is unverifiable in its current state.
• Gene93k (
talk)
18:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:TNT, my comment above and other similar articles by the same creator. The place may be real but the article one in a series of hoaxes.
• Gene93k (
talk)
19:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator or Merge to
Pinellas County, Florida unless actual sources demonstrating separate notability for this specific spot are shown; entry in
USGS GNIS is not legal recognition and doesn't meet
WP:GEOLAND, and it being "verifiable" just means
WP:ITEXISTS, not
WP:GNG. (Boilerplate I'm using for all these nominations: This is a series of
WP:HOAX articles by
Bnnnperdue (
talk·contribs), each one using a
USGS GNIS entry, then copy-pasted claims from other towns or patently-false claims about being
incorporated or otherwise a legally-autonomous entity or having some other significant history, so that it appears to the casual viewer that
WP:GEOLAND applies or otherwise gives the façade of meeting
WP:GNG, and a mess like this deletion discussion ensues. In each case, the bulk of the article has been fantasy, often provably false, sometimes with alleged locator maps, also invented by Bnnnperdue. USGS GNIS populated place entries only mean that a place with that name was once on a map or reported to exist at some point; lots of USGS GNIS entries have no significant cultural history and don't meet
WP:GNG; for example, many were mere train stops or intersections with few buildings or other activity. Given the creator's hoax history over the last few months, there's no reason to presume that a subject is/was notable; go look at
User talk:Bnnnperdue and
User:Closeapple/issues/User:Bnnnperdue and you'll see what's going on here.) --
Closeapple (
talk)
01:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.