From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 06:41, 9 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Infanta Alicia, Duchess of Calabria (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not appear to be notable as an individual. She had little to no public role. She only got some coverage when she died, and that was routine. The entire article revolves around her place on the family tree of the Spanish royal family, but Wikipedia is not a genealogy website. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. This looks like a classic case of claiming notability by inheritance. Guy ( help! - typo?) 12:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The Spanish article does reveal some significant contemporary coverage of her wedding in 1936 by reliable sources, but I'm not sure that this counts for notability. Given her long life, it is possible that she received significant coverage in historical society publications that would be difficult to access and assess. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 15:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Surtsicna: It's references 9 and 10 in Wiener Salonblatt direct link and ABC respectively. I can't speak german and spanish so I can't evaluate whether these sources are sigcov. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 20:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Pretender to the throne of Navarre. This website isn't demosntration of notability itself, since it looks self-published, but it cites dozens of sources under Fuentes y bibliografía Furius ( talk) 19:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • That she was a pretender to something is pure rubbish. The website indulges in a fantasy; she never claimed any throne or associated herself in any way with the long-defunct Navarrese monarchy. The sources do not demonstrate significant coverage of the subject. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete a clear case of deposed monarchy cruft. The throne of Navarre seems to have ceased to exist in 1841. There is not even a clear place that it would applies to. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. The significant aspect here isn't that she was pretender to Navarre, but that she was part of the royal family (and very close to succession, if Alfonso XII didn't have children, she would've been queen: [1] [2]). Her funeral got significant coverage, even by the Daily Fail ( [3]) as well as several reliable sources: [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Coverage of her was not limited to her funeral, here is an in-depth piece from her birthday in 2015: [10] in El Mundo. or coverage from ABC in 2015: [11]. British royals much more removed from succession than Alicia are notable, she was very much part of the Spanish royals and has significant coverage.-- Eostrix  ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 06:41, 9 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Infanta Alicia, Duchess of Calabria (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not appear to be notable as an individual. She had little to no public role. She only got some coverage when she died, and that was routine. The entire article revolves around her place on the family tree of the Spanish royal family, but Wikipedia is not a genealogy website. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. This looks like a classic case of claiming notability by inheritance. Guy ( help! - typo?) 12:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The Spanish article does reveal some significant contemporary coverage of her wedding in 1936 by reliable sources, but I'm not sure that this counts for notability. Given her long life, it is possible that she received significant coverage in historical society publications that would be difficult to access and assess. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 15:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Surtsicna: It's references 9 and 10 in Wiener Salonblatt direct link and ABC respectively. I can't speak german and spanish so I can't evaluate whether these sources are sigcov. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 20:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Pretender to the throne of Navarre. This website isn't demosntration of notability itself, since it looks self-published, but it cites dozens of sources under Fuentes y bibliografía Furius ( talk) 19:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • That she was a pretender to something is pure rubbish. The website indulges in a fantasy; she never claimed any throne or associated herself in any way with the long-defunct Navarrese monarchy. The sources do not demonstrate significant coverage of the subject. Surtsicna ( talk) 19:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete a clear case of deposed monarchy cruft. The throne of Navarre seems to have ceased to exist in 1841. There is not even a clear place that it would applies to. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. The significant aspect here isn't that she was pretender to Navarre, but that she was part of the royal family (and very close to succession, if Alfonso XII didn't have children, she would've been queen: [1] [2]). Her funeral got significant coverage, even by the Daily Fail ( [3]) as well as several reliable sources: [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Coverage of her was not limited to her funeral, here is an in-depth piece from her birthday in 2015: [10] in El Mundo. or coverage from ABC in 2015: [11]. British royals much more removed from succession than Alicia are notable, she was very much part of the Spanish royals and has significant coverage.-- Eostrix  ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook