- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:34, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
In-Depth Diagnostics
- In-Depth Diagnostics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a four month old non profit. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH for lack of independent sources. - Mr X 22:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:09, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. non notable, like most new companies until proved otherwise. DGG ( talk ) 05:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:34, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
In-Depth Diagnostics
- In-Depth Diagnostics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a four month old non profit. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH for lack of independent sources. - Mr X 22:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:09, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. non notable, like most new companies until proved otherwise. DGG ( talk ) 05:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.